Grabbing the Oyster is the blog of acclaimed business advisor, strategist, coach, motivational speaker and best-selling author: Pearce Flannery

Improve business - Increase Profits with Irelands leading business advisor and training facilitator -

Discover the solution. Log onto:

www.pearceflannery.com

-------------------------------

Words of Wisdom

"It is quite unacceptable that a member of Dáil Éireann and in particular a Cabinet Minister and Taoiseach, should be supported in his personal lifestyle by gifts made to him personally."

Bertie Ahern on Charles Haughey, Dáil Éireann transcript, September 1997.

Let’s be clear: A deal with Fianna Fail would be a deal with the devil. We would be spat out after five years and decimated as a party.”

Ciaran Cuffe - June 2007

"Lehmans was a world investment bank. They had testicles everywhere.”

Bertie Ahern to Kathy Sheridan of the Irish Times

"If I'm in government fluoridation will go in the first month in office. That's a guarantee."

John Gormley TD, Feb 2007

"However, I do not believe we have to compete on the basis of costs alone. Nor do I believe our strategy should be about competing on the basis of costs alone. Ireland is now a high-wage economy, and it is in our best interests that it remains a high wage economy,”

Brian Cowen, April 2007

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 5 August 2010

Our Beloved Leader

A “dictator” is a head of state who exercises arbitrary authority over the lives of his citizens and who cannot be removed from power through legal means. Kim Jong-Il of North Korea, Than Shew of Burma and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe are all dictators. They rule not because they have the approval of their citizens but because they want to rule. Brian Cowen’s democratic credentials are becoming increasingly suspect in this regard. This is a worrying development because the Taoiseach should be committed to democracy by its definition and not just on his own terms. 

Remember when he said: “As long as I am running this Government, I will run the Government as I see fit, as I believe it, based on my philosophy.” That image of him, angry, shouting, stabbing the air with his finger, is one that is hard to reconcile with the image of a committed democrat. It demonstrates how little respect he has for the very people who gave him his mandate to govern in the first place.

His unwillingness to address the issues of sleaze and corruption within his own party is equally as telling. Ivor Callely is still a member of the Fianna Fáil party and remains a Taoiseach’s nominee to Seanad Eireann. No action has been taken either by Cowen or the Fianna Fáil party. Likewise party members Willie O’Dea, John O Donoghue Bertie Ahern and Beverly Cooper-Flynn all still serve in Government in spite of their unsavoury record in public service. Surely someone committed to ‘Government of the people, by the people and for the people’ would have no allegiance with people who debase the democratic or political process. Not in Cowen’s world. His philosophy seems to mirror that of a dictator in that he keeps the spoils of office for his inner cabal and to hell with everybody else. 

A Fianna Fáil party led by Bertie Ahern were elected in coalition with the Greens in 2007. Bertie has since resigned in disgrace and Cowen was appointed but never elected leader. He was never elected Taoiseach either by his own party or by the wider public. He was told in the 2009 local elections that the public do not want him running the country in no uncertain terms and in every opinion poll since.  He does not even enjoy the internal support of his own party. Yet he continues to insist that he will remain as Taoiseach and has a constitutional right to do so. He is hiding behind the constitution, as he does not have a moral or democratic right to remain on as Taoiseach without being ratified by the electorate.

Then there is the issue of refusing to hold the three by-elections. Surely the people in the affected constituencies deserve representation. Is it not their constitutional right?  When questioned on RTE about the by-elections our beloved leader’ insulted us all with the dismissive and patronising throwaway comment ‘Don’t worry about the by-elections’. The truth is he is afraid of losing the by-elections and is willing to subvert the constitutional rights of the people in a nefarious bid to cling to power. The typical action of a dictator.

It would behove him well to remember that he inherited his political seat when he entered Dáil Eireann in a by-election. It would behove us well to remember that he was not elected Taoiseach nor was he elected leader of Fianna Fáil. The democratic process clearly does not hold sway with our beloved leader.

Cowen is avoiding holding the by-elections to ensure he holds onto power. It should not be up to the Taoiseach to decide when by-elections are held. It should be up to the people to decide, not a power hungry dictator whose only interested lies in clinging to power even though the vast majority of people want him to go. He is an affront to democracy. He is afraid to face the people.

He is a coward!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 17 July 2010

The Price of Failure

We now live in an age of cutbacks, economic austerity and diminished financial reward. We are told that we are all in this together and that we are all feeling the pain. That some people will not feel the financial pain to the same degree as others is a fact of life. Some of these are the very highly paid, such as senior executives from some of the larger companies who will take home huge salaries. They will take home these salaries if and only if they do their jobs effectively, generate acceptable results and display high levels of competence. If not they will be fired. That is the way the real world works.

Conventional wisdom would have it that given Ireland’s small size it should be easier to govern than a much larger economy. So we would expect to pay our political leaders a salary commensurate with the scale and scope of the position for that too is the way in the real world. If so our expectations are wrong! Amazingly in a list of the worlds most highly paid politicians Brian Cowen ranks as the fourth most highly paid head of state. The top ten most highly paid politicians worldwide are:

1) Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore who has an annual salary of $2.75 million. 2) Donald Tsang of Hong Kong has an annual salary of $515,300. 3) Barack Obama, President of the United States has an annual salary of $400,000. 4) Brian Cowen, Taoiseach of Ireland has an annual salary of $342,400. 5) Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France has an annual salary of $319,800. 6) Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of Australia has an annual salary of $315,800. 7) Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada has an annual salary of $309,800. 8) Jacob Zuma, President of South Africa has an annual salary of $305,800. 9) Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany has an annual salary of $303,800 10) David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom has an annual salary of $300,400.

So he's paid more than the leaders of the 3 largest economies in the EU despite almost bankrupting the country and overseeing the largest deficit in the EU. A deficit that was created under his watch. Add in expenses, pension entitlements, allowances and the ministerial car with 2 full time Garda drivers and you could conservatively double that take home figure. His pain is all too obvious to see!

His predecessor Bertie Ahern is also generously catered for with numerous salaries, extra allowances, expenses, pensions, directorships, fully expensed state car for life and Garda drivers. He is still paid as a sitting TD to work on behalf of the people although he appears to spend his time enjoying a lucrative sideline as a journalist, author, conference speaker and TV presenter. He is reputed to enjoy the highest pension entitlements and allowances of any former head of state in Europe. All this while he still cannot produce a valid tax clearance certificate. The only pain felt by Bertie is that to his enormous ego as he realises that he will never become president!.

There is an argument that if we didn't pay politicians a good salary we wouldn't attract talented people to the jobs. What specific talent do these men possess? What are we actually paying this obscene amount of money for? The Mahon tribunal will deal with Bertie Ahern’s legacy in due course. Brian Cowen is an incompetent fantasist who continually denies responsibility for issues that happened under his watch. He blames anyone and everyone for this recession without ever acknowledging that he is paid his grossly inflated salary to take responsibility, be accountable and to act decisively. By this yardstick he has failed abysmally. He is not worth the money. He is not worth any money. His record is one of repeated failure. In the real world he would and should have been fired long ago.

The actual amount paid in remuneration would be unimportant if we were getting real value for money. However we are not getting any value here. Brian Cowen oversaw and implemented the policies that drove this country into recession. He continued to deny that a problem existed until he could no longer hide from the truth. Remember the sound economic fundamentals? Now he is overseeing the implementation of some of the worst economic decisions in Irish history which will I believe cripple this country economically for years to come.

And for all this we pay him the fourth highest salary in the world. Plus expenses and allowances.

Ireland truly is a wonderful country!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 17 June 2010

Dynasty

A backbench Government TD asks his not very bright 10-year-old daughter what she wants to be when she grows up. I want to be a politician like you, I want to be Taoiseach some day, she says. Her father was delighted. Political life had been good to him. Most especially so considering he had failed in everything else he had tried his hand at. He knew that it paid people disproportionately to their abilities. Where else could an absolute oaf get such a salary and associated benefits? To be elected would secure his daughter’s future and that of all belonging to her. Oh yes, becoming a politician was a very good idea indeed. After all, its not as if you need any qualifications or ability.

So he asks his daughter what would be the first thing she would do as Taoiseach. I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people and would develop policies to ensure that all people had an equal share of all the money there is, she replied. By now her father was a little concerned about her political philosophy and from where she got such lofty altruistic ambition. She did not get such radical ideas from him.

I think with that philosophy you could be a socialist, you could join the Labour party but I really would not advise it says the politician. I don’t really know what a socialist is and I do not really have any philosophy. I just make things up as I go along, said the girl. I just try to impress people by telling them what they want to hear she added.  You would fit right in with the Labour party, said her father. Although I myself also tell people what they want to hear. It is the only way to get elected, he said.

You don't have to be Taoiseach to help people, he told his daughter. You can do it now. You can come home and mow the lawn, pull weeds, wash the dishes, and I'll pay you €20. Then we can go over to where the homeless guy begs, and you can give him the €20 to use toward food or somewhere to sleep. Just remember to get a receipt for the money from someone. I can claim it back in expenses said the backbencher.

The little girl thinks about that over for a few seconds. She may not be very bright but she is cunning for one so young. She is after all the daughter of a politician. She realises that this type of selfless dedication is not in her personal best interest. After all what is the point of doing something for someone if you do not get some benefit for yourself? What is the point of being in politics if you do not personally gain? In her opinion doing things for others without personal gain was not really politics; it was more like charity. She wasn’t really that interested in charitable work. That was for the little people. She was quickly learning what political idealism and public service really meant in Ireland.

There had to be a better way, one that would allow everyone to benefit including herself. She had a plan. How about I give the homeless guy €5, spend €5 organising a committee, pay myself €5 and keep €5 for expenses she said to her father with a twinkle in her eye. Ah, that is a different type of ideology, said her father. Maybe you should consider joining Fine Gael.

By now he little Girl understood the political process very well. Now she could see elected office providing unlimited opportunity for personal self- advancement.  She could see no reason why she couldn’t become very rich out of this exercise.  Suddenly she had a wonderful idea. Why not pay me the €20 directly as a consultancy fee, I will pay the homeless guy a few pence to go and do the work she said. We all win, you get the work done, the homeless guy gets a few pence, I make money and everybody thinks we are both wonderful caring people? We could do really well out of this homeless guy, she said excitedly.

Ah my beautiful daughter, you have come of age, said the backbench TD. Welcome to the Fianna Fáil party my dear you will fit right in. I knew you would find your way eventually. Now lets go and enjoy our three months holidays. We can deal with the homeless chap sometime after we get back if we have time!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 8 July 2010

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics

Well the good news is that the worst is over and all will be OK because the recession is officially over. Brian Lenihan has confirmed that new figures provide concrete evidence that Government policies are paying off and we are now officially out of recession. Good news except for one thing. Government policies are not paying off and we are not out of recession!

The figures used are a perfect example of the old cliché that there are lies, damned lies and statistics. If you torture and manipulate numbers to suit your agenda those numbers will confess to anything.We are being fed a line based on false evidence. The current spin that we have exited recession is based on an increase of 2.7% in our Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which refers to the total monetary value of all goods and services produced domestically by a country. GDP is not the yardstick by which we should measure Irelands economic performance. It is disingenuous for Government to use this figure as an absolute yardstick by which to measure economic performance. It smacks of deceit!

A more honest and real indicator for a small open economy like Ireland is Gross National Product which calculates the total of the goods and services produced by Irish corporations in Ireland plus goods and services produced by Irish corporations in other countries. This figure shows that the economy has fallen by 0.5% in the first quarter of 2010. This is a big drop for one quarter. These are the facts:

Minister Lenihan has claimed on four separate occasions that we have turned the corner. This was untrue on all four occasions. The truth is that we cannot turn the corner unless we get the people of this country working again. Working people are net economic contributors. They pay taxes, provide value in the form of tradable goods and services and ensure that money circulates throughout the economy. Yet there exists no real strategy of any kind to help small business. They are being starved of cash by the banks and still Government continue to give cash to the banks with no strings attached. Someone urgently needs to take control.

We do need to continue to support Bank of Ireland and Allied Irish Bank as their health is vital to economic recovery. Anglo should be closed. It is no longer relevant to economic recovery. It does nothing, it has no branches, no ATMs and provides no lending. The argument about protecting the bondholders is a spurious one. There are tens of thousands of bondholders internationally worth over €100 trillion of which less that 20 individuals have an exposure to Anglo of €14 Billion. The country is in no danger in the event of defaulting on the bondholders. We should liquidate Anglo’s assets, pay the residue to the senior debt holders and let the bondholders swing. They took the risk and they lost. Deal with it and move on.

A team of state appointed regional liquidity directors should be imposed on the banks as a prerequisite to their accessing state funds. They must ensure that the money reaches the businesses. We need a business bailout not a bank bailout. This will protect employment, create wealth and ultimately ensure that the banks themselves are recapitalised through the deposits of the business and wages of the employees.

Government is looking at the issue from the wrong perspective. A properly constructed business bailout would in effect also be a bank bailout. Support the people, the workers and the businesses and we will turn the corner and so too will the banks. At present we are supporting the banks on the banks terms without any return for our money. This is bad business practice.

The problem is that Government regards senior bankers, developers and their cronies as being key to economic recovery. They are wrong.  These people caused the problem and will never provide the solution. The solution lies in creating jobs and ultimately in trading the resulting goods and services for hard cash. To bail out the economy we need to bail out the people. We need to get people back working again.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 17 June 2010

Leave it to me!

I am writing this in a hurry before I take a holiday from all of this pressure. I need a break. In fact it is essential for the health of the nation that I do take a holiday for I have a grave responsibility on my shoulders. I now know that the future of this nation is my sole responsibility and it is a responsibility I take seriously. I must not be found wanting in our hour of need!

We are a nation without a leader. We need someone to take this country by the scruff of the neck and put it back on the right track. The opinion polls suggest that none of the current incumbents has what it takes. This leaves us all with a major problem. Happily for us all I have the solution. Me!

Already I hear the cogs of the Galway intelligensia whirring and wondering if I have been at the mushrooms or am I hearing those voices again. But sadly no to both.

I have uncovered some statistics that are frightening for the nation and for me personally. They irrefuteably prove that I alone must save the economy. I have found my destiny for it is written in the stars.

The population of Ireland is approximately 4 million of which one million are retired.
That leaves 3 million to do all the work.  There are 1.4 million in school or at Universities which leaves 1.6 million to do the work. Of this figure there are 500,000 employed in the Civil Service leaving about 1.1 million to do the work.

 
200,000 are in the public service providing essential services such as trying to keep the peace in God-forsaken foreign territories or representing our interests abroad which leaves only 900,000 to do the work. Take from that total the 200,000 people who work for local County Councils and that leaves 700,000 people to do the work.
At any given time there are 650,000 people in hospitals, on the dole, incapacitated or claiming Invalidity Benefit leaving 50,000 to do the work. Today there are 35,000 people on holidays and 14,772 people in prisons.

We also have the 226 elected members of the Oireachtas about to disappear for three months of the summer. Yes that’s right our public representatives are about to disappear for three months.  So that leaves just two people to do the work.

You and me. And there you are sitting on your arse reading the paper. So obviously it is up to me to save the country!

So now you have it in black and white. Proof if ever it were needed. I must save the economy all on my own. It is my destiny. I am the last line of defence and I must not fail in my duty. That is why I need a holiday and will return in two weeks. I will attend to the inconvienent matter of saving the economy when I get back.

What? I hear you say. This is not acceptable. How could you possibly disappear for two weeks when we are in a crisis. The country needs you I hear you say. We need leadership, we need a saviour, we need someone to run the country I hear you say.

Don’t worry. It is only for two weeks. It is not as if I were taking a quarter of the year off. In a crisis such as this taking over three months off would be downright selfish and stupid. In fact it would be unforgiveable. Nobody could be that selfish. Or could they…?

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 10 June 2010

A Donkeys Revenge

Once upon a time a group of cowboys started digging wells on a very large farm. There was a lot of money to be made from digging wells even if after a while there was no need to dig any more wells. Many were badly dug wells and were simply dug to avail of the tax relief that was available to cowboys who dug wells.

One day some donkeys fell down into a well. They cried piteously for hours. The farmer decided that it just wasn't worth it to bother with some donkeys. They had served their purpose and the well needed to be covered up anyway before anyone found out the truth about why the well was dug in the first place. He really did not care about the donkey’s welfare. A donkey was just a means for the farmer to achieve his ends.

He invited all the other farmers to come over and help him. There were many different farmers, Farmers of destiny, green farmers and a few farmers without farms, independent farmers who were useful to the bigger farmers. None of them really cared about the donkey’s welfare even though it was the donkeys that helped them get their farms in the first place. Their needs were all that was important and they were being well catered for. A little matter like a donkey could not interfere with their nice lives. So they tried to fill in the well on top of the donkeys.

At first, the donkeys realized what was happening and they cried horribly. They cried and cried and asked the farmers not to mistreat him any more. Then they eventually quietened down. They decided that enough was enough and that they had to solve this problem for themselves. They had finally realized that the farmers were only concerned about their own welfare. After a while the farmers finally looked down the well. They were astonished at what they saw. With each shovel of dirt that hit theirbacks the donkeys would shake it off and take a step up. Bit by bit they were getting themselves out of a bad situation in spite of what the farmers were trying to do to him.

As the farmer's continued to shovel dirt on top of the animals, they would shake it off and take another step up. Pretty soon the donkeys stepped up over the edge of the well. The donkeys learned from this experience and realized that that life is going to shovel dirt on you, all kinds of dirt. The trick to getting out of the wellis to shake it off and take a step up. They realized that they could get out of the deepest wells just by not stopping, never giving up!

They now knew that they would never work for or give power again to those that do not care about their welfare. It had taken a long time but the donkeys finally realized that these farmers only ever cared about themselves. It would be crazy to give power to those that had so obviously contrived to keep them down so that they and their friends could enjoy more than their fair share of what the farm had to offer.

The donkeys had learnt one more lesson. Revenge is sweet! They went back to the farm and bit the farmers who hadtried to bury them. The gash from the bite gotinfected and the farmer eventually died in agony from septic shock. Other farmers were unable to do anything for themselves because they had never done anything for themselves. They too starved. Pretty soon all the bad farmers were out of the equation and a new group of decent honorable farmers took their place.

This all happened because a donkey decided enough was enough. You see donkeys may be stupid but they too have a breaking point and when it comes the farmers better watch out. Because even the greediest, most corrupt, most incompetent farmer will eventually find out that when you do something wrong and try to cover it up it always come back to bite you. And it may turn out to be a very savage bite indeed!

You see the moral of this story is a simple one. If you have a responsibility for the welfare of others covering your ass will eventually come back to bite you!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 3 June 2010

Pick A Number

The controversy surrounding the actual number of children that have died while in state care since 2000 is ongoing. Last Friday Mary Harney stated that the figure was most likely 23 and that it was unlikely to exceed that figure but if it did it would certainly not exceed 30. Then the HSE announced that the figure was 37. We know that this figure is wrong. It is too low. It does not include the tragic cases of Danny Talbot or Daniel McAnespie. So we are at 39 and rising. In my opinion this is an exercise in damage limitation from the HSE. Protecting their reputations and positions. How many more children are not included? What about those awaiting care, awaiting evaluation and those that are classed as missing?

How dysfunctional is a society when it cannot take care of its young and is willing to apparently manipulate this reality for the purposes of political or career capital?

The HSE were asked to supply these details to the Minister for Children Barry Andrews. They refused citing “significant legislative impediments”. Yet when pressure mounted a figure was made available. I believe the HSE are not releasing the true figure because they know that it would be a shocking indictment of their ineptitude and carelessness. The people involved in the cover-up of this shocking systems failure should be deeply ashamed. They bullied Barry Andrews because he is too weak to control his portfolio. He is way out of his depth and was easily fobbed off with excuses. It is a great pity the HSE did not put as much energy into doing its job as it did in trying to save face for the last few weeks.

Our record in relation to children’s rights is abysmal. Since independence this country has effectively been governed by an unhealthy alliance between church and state. We already know that the church is guilty of an immense cover-up of unimaginable atrocities that they themselves purposefully committed. The state was complicit in this cover-up and continued to facilitate the Church of Rome as it nurtured and assisted its in-house paedophile ring. Both church and state were indifferent to the suffering.

Now we find that the state through the HSE is also guilty of failing in its duty of care to the young and does not even appear to know how many of them have even died. If the relevant individuals within the HSE do not have the precise figure to hand then they are guilty of incompetence on a massive scale and should be dismissed immediately. If they do actually have the detail readily available then they should be dismissed for refusing to hand over the information. Either way their position is untenable because they have failed in their duty of care.

We need to mature as a society in a very big way. No one of us wants to admit to having failed our children yet in a way we all have. Our health system is in chaos so our children are at risk. Our schools are under funded and over crowded so their future is also at risk. Our streets are drug ridden and dangerous. Our commitment to the welfare of our children is questionable and is the root cause of so many tragic deaths. We have a strange mindset when it comes to the young. The old Irish saying ‘Children should be seen and not heard’ is indicative of our failure to recognise the needs of the young. I understand it is unique to Ireland.  Perhaps if they were heard or more importantly if we had listened our record in the area of children’s rights would not be so appalling.

We can blame the politicians or the HSE or anyone else and they have a big case to answer. But if we are really honest we should also blame ourselves. We elected these politicians, we remain subservient to the clergy, we allow the HSE to rise roughshod over our needs and we have consistently condoned low operating standards in public life through our acceptance of these low standards for many years. We too have been weak and this must change. We are adults so we must be strong because children cannot. They need us to stand up for them and we have an obligation to them to do just that. It is time we as a nation grew up.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 27 May 2010

Economics For Beginners

I had the pleasure of studying economics in UCG in the late 1980’s. I particularly enjoyed macro-economic theory and how it relates to the management of the economy. It often focuses on an equation to compute aggregate demand, which is simply the cumulative total of goods and services consumed in the country. This figure is essential to the health of our economy.

By definition aggregate demand (AD) is the sum total of all the consumption (C), all the investment (I), all the money spent by Government (G) plus the net figure of our exports (X) minus the sum of our imports (M). Therefore the theory has as a cornerstone a very simple equation: AD = C + I + G + (X-M).

This is a simple equation with implications for our economy as it demonstrates how we must stimulate our demand for goods and services, which will lead to increased employment. So let us look at how we can do this.

We know that everybody’s spending power is much lower today so in the short term it is unlikely that we can influence our consumption of goods and services to any great extent. So stimulating consumption (C) as a strategy is not currently a viable proposition. Likewise because money is in short supply, risk levels are high and interest rates are low we are equally unlikely to increase our investment levels (I) in the economy in the short term. The Dollar is strong against the Euro so at present our exports to the US will benefit. This is positive but it is not something that is within our gift to influence. So the highly important net export figures (X-M) are becoming more positive but this result is more good luck rather than good management.

So obviously we are left with only one variable to influence how we deal with the recession. That variable is Government expenditure (G). As it stands Government is currently borrowing €500 million each week just to keep the lights on. This is called current expenditure and if at all possible it is not advisable to borrow to fund this type of spending. Unfortunately we do not have any option but to borrow to fund current expenditure. We urgently need to decrease how much we spend and potentially suffer increased taxes. There is no other way. This is unpalatable but it is one that we must all take on board soon or else the recovery will become even more painful than that which is already on the cards.

What we should do is use borrowings to fund what is known as capital expenditure. This is to fund the development of capital projects especially labour intensive capital projects such as infrastructure for education, health, transport, communications and business. This is an investment in our future and will repay the nation many times over. It is an essential course of action if we are to face the future with confidence. We need a 21ST century business infrastructure which involves domestic energy production, increased broadband penetration and a transport infrastructure that will enable us to compete with competently managed nations. Thus we are starting at a disadvantage and this disadvantage will increase unless we devise a real stimulative plan with clearly defined outcomes. In spite of all its emotive rhetoric this Government does not even have the rudiments of such a necessary plan.

This recommendation is not the panacea for all of our economic problems. But it can provide an effective foundation for recovery. Effective and targeted Government expenditure to stimulate aggregate demand is the only tool available to us. It puts into perspective the continued madness of injecting up to €30 Billion of borrowed money into Anglo, which will not stimulate the economy in any way whatsoever. Job creation must be the ultimate goal. Getting people working is the only route to economic success. Taxes will go up and social welfare payments will go down so the exchequer will be in a stronger position. This can only be achieved through the stimulation of Aggregate Demand.

Teachers taught me macro-economic theory. One would think with all the teachers we have in Government one of them would understand how an economy works. Maybe they left the profession because they were bad teachers. They are certainly bad economic managers!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 13 May 2010

Friends in low places…

“I might have appointed somebody but I appointed them because they were friends, not because of anything they had given me...”

(Brian Dobson interview with Bertie Ahern, September 27, 2006)

This is what passes for personal exoneration from the allegations of corruption in the mind of the man who wins money on horses. Ahern believes that it is absolutely OK for him to appoint his buddies to positions of responsibility, just because they are his buddies. Suitability, experience or qualifications are not even given a thought as he calls his friends to jump upon the gravy train. Unfortunately we are paying for the ticket.

This is the core of what has been rotten in the Irish political system for the last decade. The fact that people were appointed to positions of importance and authority just because they were friends of Bertie or the Fianna Fáil party. It does not appear to matter to him that the state deserved to have someone of competence or integrity fulfil these roles or that the roles were essential to the successful management of the country. All that is important was that certain people were rewarded for services rendered, not to the nation but to the party. Party loyalty is the only thing that matters.

We would not be in such a pickle today if we had appointed people of competence, courage and integrity to such positions as The Financial Regulator, FAS, DAA, The Dublin Docklands, in Planning etc. Why can’t this Government accept that we are in this situation because the people in the seats of influence in this country were in most cases incompetent at best and corrupt at worst. They prefer to hide behind excuses such as Lehman Bros collapse or international recessionary factors etc. They are afraid to acknowledge the truth because such an acknowledgement would carry personal responsibility for much of our current problems. This Government do not do responsibility very well.

After experiencing the boom of the 1990’s we should not even be feeling the pinch to the same degree that the US or Germany or other countries. We should have built up substantial cash resources and be able to ride out the worst of the recession. That is what would and should have happened if we had not allowed the management of this nation to fall into the hands of a group of arrogant buffoons who cared more for the party and its sidekicks than it cared for the young, the sick or the elderly.

Make no mistake about it the international credit crises or the failure of Lehman Brothers is not the root cause of our economic problems. Our problems are greater by far than any comparable western or developed economy. Yes we would have been under economic pressure but we would not be faced with such issues as NAMA, Anglo Irish Bank, Negative equity, house price deflation and an inability to legislate properly for such economic challenges. These issues are unique to Ireland and they are a direct cause of the hooky mindset.

The lucky gambler ensured that positions of authority, state positions and political positions alike were staffed by yes men who subscribed to this disgraceful philosophy. As a result Ministers, senior public servants and appointees to state boards were all political appointments, appointed only because of their political allegiances and political friendships. Rarely if ever did ability, qualifications or competence come into the mix. Brian Cowen follows this self same philosophy.

In Government we have the same scenario. For example Mary Coughlan is widely regarded as being an abject failure in the Dept of Enterprise Trade and Employment. She is regarded by many as being the worst Minister in living memory. So when the reshuffle came about it was reasonable to assume that she would be demoted and taken out of harms way. But no, in typical Fianna Fáil fashion the deckchairs were shifted about and she was appointed to the position of minister for Education. This is a serious indictment of the importance this Government places on education. Ability or competence were not even considered. 

Virtues such as integrity, qualifications or merit were never important to people like the lucky gambler and his bagman. Look after your own and they will look after you and the rest do not count is the creed.

Until we rid the country of this mindset we will not solve the greater issues facing the country. We cannot solve them because those with the mandate to solve them do not have the ability. They do not have the ability because they were not appointed on merit.

You could say the same for Government!

An interesting organisational observation of Government.

Those at the top look down at the organisation and all they see is a load of crap.

Those at the bottom look up and all they see are arseholes!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 6 May 2010

The Quality of Life

One of the realities of the current economic crises is that most of us have woken up to the reality of being dependent on others. Whether its on the banks, our employers, the state or even our friends and families no one of us is an island. This may herald the one true positive to be taken from the demise of the celtic tiger. That is that we may have once again discovered our sense of community and civic responsibility.

 All over Galway every day people give voluntarily of their time and energies to help further the aims of some community organisation. Maybe it is a sports club, charity or community development organisation. Whatever the organisation may be, the end result is an enhanced society from which we all gain.

 Given that we all have something to offer maybe the time has come to ask ourselves what each of us can do. How can we as individuals contribute toward some voluntary organisation and help improve the lot of Galway people and hence the entire community which by definition includes our families, our friends and ourselves. I see volunteers working with children every week and am constantly impressed with their commitment and energy. I am even more impressed with the fact that they are also enjoying themselves immensely. There is no doubt that there is a feel-good factor from doing a voluntary service. Even more so when you know that ones community and probably ones own children will reap the benefits.

So maybe now is the time for everybody to make a mental commitment to become involved in and support at least one voluntary organisation. I really believe that this is the way to defeat the recession. The Austrian psychologist Victor Fankl stated that choice is the last great human freedom. We have the choice to make a difference in our society and the choice not to let the current economic challenges set the tone for the way we live going forward. But we must make that choice and commit to it.

 I regularly give motivational talks on the subject of attitude and its importance to success, in the field of business, on the field of play and especially in our communities. Our financial net worth may have been diminished but our quality of life does not have to be. If Galway as a community of people adopts a positive, can-do attitude which involves making a commitment to helping our town develop in a social sense then we will leave a legacy for our children that money alone could never buy.

We have all heard that we have lost our sense of community. That in days gone by we were poor but we were happy, that people looked out for one another and that somehow times were better. This is a load of nonsense. This world in which we live today is better than at any time in its history. We have advances in healthcare and education and enjoy comforts that we dared not even dream of fifty years ago. The only thing that we do not have today which was better than in the past is an equally strong sense of community and place. This is in part due to our changing environment, and to globalisation and communications advances but it is I feel primarily due to the pace in which we have been living our lives. We simply have not had time for our neighbours. Now we do have the time and our community needs the support that a community can give like never before.

It is reasonable to assume that someone we know is currently under severe pressure and as a result so too are their families. Maybe they rely on a charity, or their children get some comfort from the local sports club, or perhaps they may only need a kind word. We must be ready to give so we all can gain.

Whatever the commitment you make, commit that you will try to make a difference. If we can all do this then when we turn the economic corner we will have a society to be proud of. One that is inclusive, caring and community focussed. We can also enjoy being part of the transition to a better Galway.  It is said that nothing is a waste if we learn from it. Let us not waste this recession for the lack of a commitment. If we all commit then the power within that cumulative commitment is immense.

Lets all become part of something great. In the long run we will be glad we did!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 29 April 2010

Saving Private 'Ireland'

The job of rescuing the economy is truly an enormous one. I am on record as stating that I do not believe the current Government is either competent or experienced enough to deal with the issues. Their economically restrictive and fiscally deflationary policies are doomed to fail and will in the long run leave us with greater problems than we are currently experiencing.

So what should be done? In fairness it is easy to criticise but a little harder to propose real solutions to the current crises. So that is what I am going to do.

I have documented below Five urgent actions which, if implemented immediately will result in real quantifiable results to our economy in the form of increased employment, increased tax take for the exchequer and a radically enhanced balance of payments. These are the stimulus that our economy requires as opposed to the bailing out of inept financial institutions who are notable more for their close allegiances with  this current Government than their successes as financial institutions. They will never save this economy and hence they should not be the Governments immediate priority.

Urgent action number 1: Do not guarantee Anglo again next September and earmark the funds saved from this plan to create employment through the measures outlined below. This would simply necessitate liquidating Anglos assets and paying the residue in the appropriate ratio to the senior debt holders and letting the subordinated debt holders swing.

Urgent action number 2: Develop a large scale energy capture programme on the west coast. This should involve developing the spirit of Ireland project which would provide an energy export market in excess of €50 Billion per annum within five years. Large scale investment in green and renewable industrial development programmes in NUIG and GMIT including dedicated departments to education and research and development for renewable energy. Connacht can be made the world leader in the provision in renewable and clean energy with all the resulting spin-offs for the country.

Urgent action number 3: An increased budget for capital infrastructure spent immediately on such things as broadband rollout, development of our ports, airports and roads. Our peripheral geographic location must become our strength so we need to immediately focus on becoming a strategic cargo hub for world commerce. Likewise our electronic connectivity must become a model for best practice throughout the world. Our broadband infrastructure is a joke and is lagging behind that of many third world countries. We need to focus on having world class broadband whatever the cost as without it we will be playing catch up for decades to come.

Urgent action number 4: Develop a panel of senior business achievers and utilise them as advisors to Dept of Enterprise. There are a considerable number of apolitical people with experience and a significant track record of achievement in this country. We should utilise their expertise. These must not be political appointments and should be only those people that have demonstrated significant levels of business achievement. One of the key problems we have at present face is the plethora of buffoons on state boards serving only to act as a blockage to progress. Many of them have been appointed as a payoff for some dubious service provided to Government and not on their ability, experience or vision. This needs to stop. The collective recommendations of these chosen achievers should be published on a quarterly basis and the Government of the time held to account as to their success in implementing these recommendations.

Urgent action number 4: Redefine brief and terms of reference of state agencies involved in enterprise and employment creation. One organisation to oversee and streamline these bodies would be desirable. For example Enterprise Ireland, the IDA, FAS, Uadaras etc are all operating in a radically changed environment from that which they faced as little as three years ago. It is a different world yet their terms of reference, mandates and their briefs remain much the same. Their budgets have actually been cut and absolutely no re-organisation, training or redirection has taken place. We must increase the resources of the City and County Enterprise Boards. These boards deal with small, indigenous and family businesses, which account for over 75% of Irish industry. These are the forgotten hero’s in the battle for employment creation and yet they find themselves constrained due to budget cuts.

Urgent action number 5: Hold a general election and elect people with integrity, ability and real experience.

The only thing we know for sure is that the current incumbents are not up to the job!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 23 April 2010

Let the record show...

I have received some correspondence over the last few months telling me that I am unbalanced in my column because I have an anti-Fianna Fail agenda. This would be one of the more moderate and considered communications. Others have not been quite so polite. To set the record straight here is my personal position.

I am not anti-Fianna Fáil per se but I am definitely anti this Fianna Fáil Government. I have no respect for the culture within the party that condones stroke pulling. corruption and self-enrichment at the expense of the electorate. Fianna Fáil has morphed into something reflective of the baser elements of political and public life. I believe the Fianna Fáil party is sick and it needs rehabilitation. This can only come about through a protracted spell in opposition. I cannot equate the current shambles with its past. Objective analysts whatever their political persuasion or viewpoint, generally agree that such a hooky philosophy was not that of DeValera, Lemass or Lynch, whatever other failings they may have had. Their vision imperfect though it may have been was driven by an idealism far removed from self-enrichment and corruption.

Since then we have had such beacons of integrity as Charlie Haughey, Sean Doherty, Bertie Ahern, Liam Lawlor, Pee Flynn, Ray Burke, Brian Lenihan, Denis Foley, Ivor Callely, Wil lie O Dea, John O Donoghue and Beverly Cooper Flynn to name but a few. Locally we have been subjected to the ignominy of Michael ‘Stroke’ Fahy being convicted in the courts and subsequently being re-elected. The saying that power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely could have been written with many of these guys in mind.

This list is just of some of those tainted by the allegations of  sleaze and corruption. I have not even entered the domain of devising a list of incompetence.

But we should note that some of the most startling issues of our time are all driven by this current crop of Fianna Fáil representatives. NAMA, Anglo Irish Bank, Nationalisation, Failure to demand accountability from the Church, Decentralisation, E-Voting, PPARS, Capitulation to the banks, Increasing VAT to 21.5%, Tax cuts, Medical cards, Cutting payments to the blind, The establishment of the HSE as it now exists, FAS budgets, Pension Levy, Cutting top rate of public servants pay by a smaller amount, etc. The list is seemingly endless but it all results in the taxpayer paying the bill for their selfish arrogance and corruption.

This is why I am taking this public stand against this Fianna Fáil government. And I will continue to do so until we have driven a change in the acceptable culture in public life where honesty, integrity and a commitment to public service are once again the corner stone of our political system.

I will not vote for a Fianna Fáil or a Green patty in the next election. But I do believe Irelands needs a strong and healthy Fianna Fáil just as we need a strong and healthy opposition right now. Democracy demands strong opposition and that is where Fianna Fáil must spend some time until they have found their moral compass. Brian Cowens mutterings to the faithful that he did not need anyone to keep him straight are starting to sound comical. He might not need a moral watchdog but his party does and he is after all the leader of the party. Does he not feel some responsibility for what his beloved party has evolved into or is he simply too prejudiced to see the real picture?

There are many honest, capable and visionary people in the Fianna Fáil party. These are the people who must rescue the party from itself. These are the people that must be given their chance. They are not part of the old paradigm and they are not tainted by the culture of sleaze and corruption has its origins in the fundraising vehicle known as TACA driven initially by Haughey in the 1960’s. It must end now with a new Government of new people.  A vote for the any existing Fianna Fáil politician is simply an endorsement of failure.

Over time this may change and so may I. But right now I feel disgusted and betrayed and will do all I can to drive change.

I hope my position is clear.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 15 April 2010

Political Scrappage Scheme

It is accepted that if in animal is in pain and beyond help that the kindest course of action is to put it out of its misery. Why is this philosophy has not transferred to the economic or political establishment?  I am especially referring to the government’s insistence in maintaining the hugely expensive charade that we refer to as Anglo. I refuse to call it Anglo Irish Bank because it is not a bank. It is not open for business and does not offer banking services. Its only function is to demand public funds to maintain its comatose position on a life support system. It should be put out of its misery immediately.

There is no real economic argument to the contrary although there may be some Machiavellian political reasons to keep it alive lest more information on its unusual relationship with the current political establishment is uncovered. I suggest that there are many in Government circles that would prefer that this would not happen.

The argument that we cannot default once the guarantee lapses is a spurious one. Firstly it would not be the Irish people or it’s Government that defaults. It would simply be the liquidation of a badly managed piggy bank with those that speculated on its success taking the pain. This is as it should be.

We should let the guarantee lapse and then default and let the speculators to take what is offered from the residue. We could sell the deposits of Anglo to one of the bigger international banks to protect depositors. It is a more desirable course of action than increasing taxes, decreasing public sector wages (again) and cutting social welfare because make no mistake that will happen come the next budget. If we continue with this farce the country will become bankrupt! Letting Anglo fall on its sword is the least worse option and not the rubbish we are being fed by those that are gambling our children’s futures to protect their tarnished reputations. One can only surmise that they must be trying to hide something of mind-blowingly scandalous proportions.

It is most worrying that the people that are insisting on bailing out Anglo are the same people who reassured us that the fundamentals were fine, that the property market would achieve a soft landing and that the Irish financial system was well regulated, and financially solvent in the first place. These were the lies from a bunch of proven incompetents drunk with power, convinced of their personal infallibility and absolutely unconcerned with the needs of the electorate. They should be ashamed of themselves but they continue to deny responsibility. Such is the nature of hubris.

Why on earth should we believe people who have displayed such ineptitude and deceit throughout this whole sorry escapade? In any normal business such people would have been fired long ago and a new team put in place to rescue the situation. Here the bankers still have their jobs, bonuses and pensions, the financial regulator has retired with full financial entitlements, the builders still live in luxury palaces and the politicians are still in office.

If we let Anglo fail we will still be able to borrow on the international markets if they see a good business proposition in Ireland and if they believe our economy will grow again. That is the reality. This can only happen if we stimulate the economy and create jobs instead of wasting money keeping the piggy bank open. So far all we have really seen is a dubious car scrappage scheme and much idiotic rhetoric from Government. This will not change for like the scorpion and the frog it is what they do.

It boggles the mind that Government will gamble €30 Billion to hide some unpleasant truths and cannot be a little more creative than a scrappage scheme to save the economy. They prioritise self-protection over the national interest and we will all pay a severe penalty for years to come. We must call a halt to this charade.

Maybe a political scrappage scheme where politicians are forced to retire is the answer. We need to get rid of the obsolete, useless, farting old bangers that do nothing but create noise, trouble and mayhem. The cars can wait. Lets get the politicians off the road.

Go now or go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect your pension, do not come back!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 8 April 2010

Organic Nation

Farming has historically been the primary industry in this country. As a profession it is under considerable pressure because it is no longer a profitable enterprise for the majority of farmers. Low prices for produce and increased operating costs coupled with the small size of the individual farm units have reduced the commercial viability of the farming industry. In some ways EU regulation is a barrier to development of the industry although overall it is true that without the EU it would be in even further economic trouble.

If farming was a mainstream business or industry the plug would have been pulled on most individual farms and probably on the industry as a whole it a long time ago. Any other business having similar financial fundamentals would be closed immediately. Such is the way for a business that is not economically viable. The reality is that farming in Ireland is no longer viable so for it to survive or thrive it must change the way that it does its business. It must be come more businesslike and market focussed.

It is not a good business to be in because foreign competitors can produce at a much lower cost in some cases at a similar quality. As a business advisor I work with businesses on a regular basis to help them find a competitive advantage in their particular marketplace. Such work always commences with an examination of the operating environment of the business.

In agricultures case it is clear to see that Irish produce has lost its competitive advantage as its price position is uncompetitive and its quality can in many cases be replicated at this lower cost. As regards price irish agriculture at a severe disadvantage, we are no longer competitive and may never be again. There is a solution to this problem. A strategy that will ensure the long term profitability of the entire industry but it will require a change of mindset of all stakeholders in the industry.

The industry urgently needs to find added value and develop competitive advantages not related to price. As a nation we could become a premium brand that can command a premium price. Therein lies the challenge for the agricultural industry in Ireland.

One way to reposition the industry at the top of the international agricultural food chain and ensure that our produce enjoys a strong consistent demand at a premium price would be to become an organic farming nation. We would be the only one on the planet. This would make us unique, marketable and able to enjoy a price positioning at the elite end of the food chain. Our competitive advantage could become our national commitment to environmental standards and organic produce.

Granted it would be a difficult project to implement and to police but not impossible. It would require the commitment of all stakeholders and vigorous policing with stringent penalties for the breach of the new agricultural protocols.  The benefits to the farming industry, tourism and the country are potentially huge. It would redefine our international image and reputation and would have associated benefits for tourism and many other industries.

Being at the top of the food value chain would overcome the current problem of our produce fetching discount prices hence ensuring that agriculture in Ireland is no longer a viable proposition. It would also enable us to avoid EU competition directives or quotas, as we would not realistically have comparable competition.

Agriculture is both a mainstream domestic industry and a export-oriented business. The farming community realise this better than anyone. The Government however seem to approach it more as a collection of cottage industries that should be indulged rather than developed and exploited. This does a grave disservice to an important industry and one of the nations greatest potential assets.

We hear much rhetoric about the smart economy from people that are not all that smart themselves. To develop a smart economy we need to develop smart business operating in a smart environment facilitated by Government. We need to stimulate innovative practices across all industries and sectors. We need to think smart because a smart economy needs people capable of smart thinking. You cannot build a smart economy without smart people at the helm.

That is our limitation!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 1 April 2010

A History of Business Education

Teaching Business In 1970: A farmer sells a truckload of turnips for €100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price.

Your assignment: Calculate his profit?

Teaching Business In 1980: A farmer sells a truckload of turnips for €100. His cost of production is 80% of the price.

Your assignment: Calculate his profit?

Teaching Business In 1990: A Farmer sells a truckload of turnips for €100. His cost of production is €80.

Your Assignment: Calculate his profit?

Teaching Business  In 2000: A farmer sells a truckload of turnips for €100. His cost of production is €80 and his profit is €20.

Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

Teaching Business  In 2005: A farmer cuts down a beautiful forest to reclaim land to grow turnips to sell so that he can feed his children. Certain minority interest groups claim he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands.

Your assignment: Discuss how the birds and squirrels might feel as the farmer cut down their homes just for a profit of €20. Is profit in itself justified?

Teaching Business Studies In 2009: A farmer is arrested for trying to cut down a tree in case it may be offensive to certain minority groups not consulted in the felling licence. He is also fined a €100 as his chainsaw is in breach of Health and Safety legislation. He has used the chainsaw for over 20 years without incident and he protests and is taken to court and fined another €100 for wasting court time. On released he returns to find environmentalists have set up a camp in the trees on his land. He tries to protect his land but is arrested, prosecuted for harassing an ethnic minority, imprisoned and fined €100. He protests and is taken to court and fined another €100 for wasting court time. While he is in jail the eco-mentalists and their dogs have gone home to the UK for the winter. They also leave behind several tonnes of rubbish strewn across the once beautiful landscape. The farmer is warned that failure to clear the rubbish immediately at his own cost is an offence. He protests and is immediately arrested for environmental pollution, breach of the peace and made pay for safe disposal costs by a regulated government contractor. He protests and is taken to court and fined another €100 for wasting court time. 

Your assignment: Discuss how many times is the farmer going to have to be arrested and fined before he realises that he is never going to make a legitimate profit in Ireland through honest hard work?

Teaching Business Studies In 2010: A farmer cannot sell a lorry load of turnips because he cannot get a loan to buy either turnip seeds or a lorry. His bank has spent all his money on developers and lost the lot with only a small amount of money left to pay bonuses to their senior people. The farmer struggles to pay the road tax on his old lorry however, as it was built in the 1970s it no longer meets the emissions regulations and he is forced to scrap it. Now he must walk or transport his turnips in a wheelbarrow. Some dodgy Eastern European hauliers buy the lorry from the scrap merchant and put it back on the road. They undercut everyone on price for haulage and send their cash back home, while claiming unemployment for themselves and their relatives. If questioned they speak no English and it is easier to deport them at the governments expense. Following their holiday back home they return to Ireland with different names and start again. The farmers and the haulage contractors are accused of being a bigoted racists and the subsequent negative publicity is the final straw and they all go out of business. The Government borrows more money to pay unemployment benefit and more bonuses to the bankers. 

Your Assignment: Give up this course and take up one that will enable you to get a job working for the state.

Then you really are in business!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 25 March 2010

I Blame Keano!

“You were a crap player and you are a crap manager. The only reason I have any dealings with you is that somehow you are the manager of my country and you’re not even Irish….”

It is alleged that after this tirade Roy Keane walked out of the Irish team at Saipan in 2002. Little did he know exactly what he just started because start something he did. All contemporary economic and social wisdom indicates that the rot that exists in our socio economic and political system began to manifest itself during the middle of 2002 or thereabouts. Given that those tasked with managing the economy at the time deny any responsibility then obviously someone else must be responsible for our economic distress. My money is on Roy Keane.

Many people attribute the economic mess to the incompetence of Bertie Ahern, who, in a vain bid to maintain power at all costs pandered to every interest group with an economic philosophy of spend-spend-spend just to maintain the charade. With a tenuous grasp on economic reality he saw the in construction industry the means to pay for this profligacy. He pandered to the construction industry on a massive scale, gave tax incentives and practically ignored the concept of financial regulation. The actual financial regulator was an incompetent that was appointed by Ahern. This will no doubt go down in history as the worst economic performance in the history of the state. The man who wins money on horses has left us with some legacy.

Brian Cowen supported the lucky gambler every inch of the way. As Minister for Finance he continued to fuel the flames of financial excess and economic mismanagement. Ahern and Cowen continue to hold public office and have not been called to task in any way. Ahern still enjoys a TD’s salary, Ministerial pension, state car and driver for life, tax exemption on his book, and numerous stipends from writing sports columns for tabloid newspapers and public speaking engagements where he tells anyone who is still willing to listen how he personally saved the country from penury. I assume his book qualified for tax exemption because it is a work of fiction.

 All this income is in addition to the income that he wins from his hugely successful gig as a gambler as he enjoys considerable success in winning money on the gee gee’s. Or so he claims. Remember he still cannot produce a tax clearance cert, although any self-employed citizen must hold one in order to get any state contracts. Why does he enjoy such special status? Given that these economic powerhouses are still employed by the state we must assume the economic woes cannot possibly be attributable to them. So who is to blame?

I say it is Roy Keane’s fault! When this economic mess was in its infancy an unusual social catastrophe was to befall the country. Pretty much everyone had an opinion in the matter of Keano Vs McCarthy. Indeed the man who wins money on horses personally volunteered to intervene in the debate and save the day. The Gambler would have been confident of his ability to pull the wool over people’s eyes at that time. He had just bought us all off with a self serving economic agenda and now had no intention of worrying about the consequences. They wouldn’t really become an issue during his tenure as Taoiseach. Someone else could worry about that. This is about the only thing he has been correct about during the entire life of his Government.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 18 March 2010

Buggins Turn...

”It's not easy being green.
It seems you blend in

with so many other ordinary things
And people tend to pass you over

'cause you're not standing out…”

Kermit from the Muppets

It is reported that the Greens have a deal in place to rotate their cabinet seats so as to ensure that they all get to experience life as a cabinet minister. What are they playing at? Its highly unlikely that they will withdraw from Government so why all this posturing? They know that if they force an election that they will lose all of their seats and signal the end of the party. Messers Gormally and Ryan want to limp on until June 14th to qualify for a ministerial pension or risk returning to their previous positions working in a language school or organising cycling Safaris. Not an enticing prospect for people who have displayed such affection for the trappings of office.

Swapping a ministerial seat so another TD gets a profile boost to help save his seat is not a rational move for one whose own future is so precarious. Perhaps John Gormally wants to be Mayor of Dublin or it may have something to with not wanting to defend the Dockland report or putting another €6 billion into Anglo. The thought of having to defend a report whose central player is Seanie Fitzpatrick may also be too much for him. If this is the case then it is a pity he does not display some semblance of integrity and leave Government instead of playing political games.

It would take at least a year for a new minister to get the hang of their role. So ministers only really begin to produce policy initiatives in their second year. Gormally is only now in a position to produce and implement policy but is apparently jacking it in to share the goodies out amongst his fellow sandalistas. Insisting on giving his buddy a go on the swings at our expense. This is cronyism at its absolute worst. It brings the credibility of the green party to a new low.

A cabinet seat rotation such as this was introduced by the Greens in Germany in the 1980s. It was quickly abolished because it made their parliamentary work more inefficient. It’s a pity our eco-mentalists refuse to learn from their mistakes. Or perhaps now that they are in coalition with Fianna Fáil they have abandoned their original agenda and like the Normans of old they have become more Irish than the Irish themselves. Cronyism, double standards and the convenient jettisoning of principles are traits that they appear to have learnt all to easily.  They were taught well.

Outside of his rapidly shrinking party John Gormally is not going to be missed at the cabinet table. His legacy does little to inspire. Remember that the Greens are complicit in allowing NAMA to happen. Remember too that amongst other things he allowed a motorway be built through Tara. The toxic dump in Cork harbour is still there. He allowed the building of an incinerator in his own constituency. Hare coursing continues while in a recession he spends €70,000 euro counting frogs. He implemented a bike scheme providing bicycles without cycle lanes. Contaminated drinking water continues to exist all around the country and let us not forget that he also promised that if in Government he would remove fluoride from all drinking water in his first year in office. Locally Lough Corrib like many of our waterways is slowly dying and is polluted not to mention the invasion of numerous invasive species. He has failed the electorate and reneged on his promises just so he can dine at the top table. He has sold out on the green agenda and the public are unlikely to forget or forgive.

The Green party is at war with itself and will in all likelihood be wiped out in the next election. Well-done Minister Gormally. Twenty-five years of hard work by the green movement destroyed for some light bulbs and a Ministerial pension. The price of ones principles is surprisingly low!

Post Ssript: As far as I can see the only accomplishment of the sandalistas to date was when Dan Boyle twittered that he was uncomfortable with the whole Willie O Dea affair. Thus a twit, an unelected member of the Oireachtas managed to force the resignation of a cabinet minister.

You could say that Fianna Fáil were caught with their pants down and but Dan Boyle took out their Willie! 

Now there is an image that doesn’t bear thinking about!

More words of wisdom...

"Bank of Ireland shares are € 3.80 today. Now if I meet you here next year, or the year after, do you seriously think Bank of Ireland shares will be € 3.80? I'd go out and buy Bank of Ireland shares, that's what I'd do." - Bertie Ahern - 19 Sep 2008

Wow! With economic foresight like that is it any wonder that the country is in the pickle that it is in? Another gem from the man that wins money on horses!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 4 March 2010

No experience required…

I wrote recently of the urgent need for competence in Government. Commercial competence gained through experience at the coalface is essential to successfully negotiate the current economic challenges. In any major public organisation the people at the helm are appointed on ability gained through experience of working at a high level in business.

So what business experience does this current cabinet possess? One would assume that they were appointed because of their achievements in industry or other significant accomplishments that distinguished them in their earlier careers. In other words one would assume that the people holding the most important and influential offices in the land would have a track record of achievement in related portfolios in their previous professional lives.

This does not appear to be the case. Most only exhibit some experience in the world of politics. The cabinet are expected to be economically and commercially competent in spite of the fact that in the main they are not sufficiently experienced or qualified to fulfil their roles. This is why they are accused of being out of touch with reality and with the needs of the business community. So maybe we are not being fair. Perhaps we should not place the blame at the doors of the individuals and hold the person that appointed them culpable. That person is Brian Cowen

So what did the cabinet actually do before they were promoted to positions. Positions, which are obviously far above their levels of competence?

Brian Cowen is a law graduate from UCD and was twenty-four years old when he took his fathers seat in the Dáil. Given that he spent a minimum of five years studying he can have no business experience to speak of. 

Dermot Ahern, Brian Lenihan and former Minister Wil lie O'Dea are barristers. No business or economic expertise of note there either.

Noel Dempsey, Michael Martin and Mary Hanafin are national school-teachers. Perhaps they are excellent teachers, but this experience in itself does not equip them to govern. Similarly Batt O'Keeffe was a college lecturer. Mary Harney also qualified as a teacher and was a student in TCD when appointed to the Senate in 1977.

Mary Coughlan left UCD at the age of 21 and immediately took her late fathers seat. The Minister for job creation has never had a job and it certainly shows. A classic case of an appointment on the basis of political expedience instead of operational competence.

Brendan Smith was a professional Fianna Fáil Political Advisor. John Gormally was an administrator in the Academy of European Languages.

Martin Cullen worked as a sales-rep for a wine company. Eamonn O’Cuiv was manager of a Gaeltacht Co-op and Eamonn Ryan was a tour operator organising cycling safaris. These three have all of the commercial experience in cabinet. These people will not save the economy because they are simply not able.

           Let us not forget former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern who claimed to be a graduate of both UCD and the London School of Economics. Both claims were subsequently proven to be false and both universities have no record of him studying there. Apparently he was an accounts clerk in the Mater Hospital and not an accountant as claimed. More phoney propaganda from the man who wins money on horses! However such overt insincerity only highlights the fact the Ahern at least realised that qualifications and experience are needed to manage an economy and disingenuously tried to hide his obvious political limitation.

The bottom line is that this Government are not equipped to manage an economy or to implement policies that will enable the country to function effectively. They cannot do this because they are simply not able. They have neither the experience, energy nor qualifications. They should never have been appointed. That they were indicates that Brian Cowen evidently places party political issues above the greater needs of the country. This is not their fault but the fact that they insist on maintaining the charade is. At a minimum we need a radical reshuffle however this will not change the fact that this Government has lost the moral authority to govern. If they have any integrity and I suspect that many of them do then it is time to do the decent thing and go to the country.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 25 February 2010

Liar Liar...

I have an easy job writing this column this week because much of this column is a transcript from the Ryanair website. It makes for some interesting reading.

It starts– “Ryanair, Ireland’s largest airline, this afternoon (17 Feb) rejected the false claims made by An Taoiseach, Brian Cowen in the Dáil this morning, which mirrored equally misleading claims made by Tánaiste Mary Coughlan yesterday.In the Dáil this morning, An Taoiseach made four false claims about Ryanair’s offer to create up to 300 jobs, if the airline was sold or leased the Hangar 6 heavy maintenance facility.

Lie No. 1: The Taoiseach claimed that Aer Lingus has a 20-year lease over the Hangar 6 facility and that this lease cannot be broken.This is untrue, since the Tánaiste at last night’s meeting with Ryanair confirmed that Aer Lingus’ 20-year lease has the same 12-month’s notice clause in it (as all DAA leases do), allowing the DAA to request Aer Lingus to vacate Hangar 6.The exercise of this Clause by the Govt owned DAA would not be a breach of the lease, and nor would it be breaking the law, as the Taoiseach wrongly claimed.

Lie No. 2: The Taoiseach claimed that there was a 24 months notice period in the Aer Lingus Hangar 6 lease.This is also untrue, since the Tánaiste at last evening’s meeting with Ryanair confirmed that the notice clause in the Aer Lingus Hangar 6 lease was 12 months.The fact that Aer Lingus have put very little into Hangar 6 (other than 95 line engineers) means that this facility could be vacated by Aer Lingus within 12 weeks which would allow Ryanair to start recruiting some former SRT engineers for heavy maintenance on Ryanair’s fleet from September 2010 onwards.

Lie No. 3: The Taoiseach claimed that there was “a competition” for the Hangar 6 facility.This is untrue.There was no such competition.Ryanair calls on the Taoiseach to publish the terms of this competition (since they don’t exist) and he should also confirm how Aer Lingus won this competition in November, when they created not one new job in the Hangar 6 facility, over Ryanair, which offered (last September) to create up to 500 jobs in the facility. How could an airline creating no jobs, win this alleged competition over an airline offering to create 500 jobs.The Taoiseach should explain this false claim.

Lie No. 4: The Taoiseach claimed Ryanair “did not make an offer” for Hangar 6.This is also untrue.Ryanair have published the written offers it made directly to An Tánaiste in August and September last year, offering to create up to 500 maintenance jobs in Hangar 6 on the basis that Ryanair would be sold or leased the Hangar 6 facility.The Taoiseach’s claim that Ryanair did not make an offer for the facility is false.

Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary said: “It is extraordinary that the Taoiseach has now allowed himself to be tied up in the same lies which have been put about by the DAA for a number of days now.The Tánaiste last night confirmed

Ryanair calls on the Taoiseach to correct these false claims, or alternatively publish the terms of the competition he claims Aer Lingus won last year………”

The Ryanair website appears to say it all although the question remains why did the government allow 500 jobs to purposefully go to waste?

If as I suspect this happened because of a deliberate policy to spite Ryanair irrespective of the responsibility or repercussions to the people involved, then those responsible for such overt incompetence need to be exposed for what they are and driven completely from public life.

At an absolute minimum, regardless of any alleged lies told in the Dáil or elsewhere, we are talking about gross and appalling self-serving incompetence. This is absolutely unacceptable on every level. You should not play petty politics with people's livelihoods.

            We have sunk to new lows in public office and that is saying something!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 18 February 2010

Grifters

In this column last August I criticised the ridiculous economic strategy better known to us all as NAMA. I illustrated how it can never achieve its objective and how it will be a financial millstone around our necks for generations to come. It came to light in the last week that Messres Cowen and Lenihan knew this all along but decided to carry on regardless.

The day after the Emergency Budget last April Brian Lenihan stated that Nama was "about bailing out the Irish economy. This is about ensuring that businesses who cannot access credit can access credit". This was patently untrue and he knew this at the time.

In September his colleague Brian Cowen said: "All of our activity is toward protecting the taxpayer, while affecting a restructuring of the banking system which will help us deal with the core issue: more access to credit for Irish businesses at this time." This too was untrue and he also knew it to be untrue at the time.

You see an eminent economist nemed Steven Seegil who is also the senior advisor for monetary issues in the International Monetary Federation (the IMF) told them so.  Mr Seelig on behalf of the IMF warned Messers Lenihan and Cowen on April 29 last year that the IMF in his words “do not believe that NAMA will result in a significant increase in bank lending in Ireland.” Proof that Messers Cowen and Lenihan did not have IMF backing for NAMA.

We also know that the original mark-down estimate of 30 per cent was an absolute fairy story based on wishful thinking rather than any reasoned economic analysis. Valuations will be much lower and will end up costing the taxpayer vastly increased sums.

It is also anticipated that as of July 1 the ECB will no longer provide credit lines to our banks. The banks are well aware of this and are currently recalling cash from their clients in any way they can. The manner and methods they are utilising are more than a little distasteful with serious and undue pressure being brought to bear irrespective of how an individual has honoured their obligations. They are acting like bullies.

Even so they cannot recoup enough funds to overcome this deficit and as a result they will without doubt be nationalised late this year. Messers Lenihan and Cowen know this too yet they persist with the NAMA fiasco. This is why they are so far behind target in transferring the toxic loans into NAMA. They know that the concept  is doomed and are trying to minimise the losses that they have committed us to. That they are willing to take such an ill advised gamble with all of our lives and futures displays frigthening levels of hubris.

This country is apparently managed by a pair of grifters. They cannot do the right thing because they are indebted to too many vested interest groups. They have in all probability lost sight of what the right thing even is. Taking care of the bankers, developers and a motly assortment of party hacks is their priority because they are indebted to these people. They know that these people can also open a pandoras box for Government if not properly taken care of.  We the electorate are just the means to this end. This became obvious when we found out that they chose to force through NAMA in spite of mass protestation including that of the IMF. Crazy in the extreme!

So we are in the situation that a couple of grifters, economic illiterates who choose to defy the majority of established economic wisdom and implement a plan that is certain to fail. They are willing to do this because they themselves are unlikely to feel the reprecussions. Their buddies fresh from the NAMA bailout will see them right.

They are so out of touch with peoples needs and feelings that they are willing play monopoly with our lives. I for one object to this cavalier atttiude towards my childrens future.

Post Script: Messers Cowen and Lenihan are aptly titled for messers is precisely what they are! Unfortunately we will be the ones to pay for the mess and we will pay a heavy price.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 11 February 2010

In search of competence

In a book I wrote called ‘Grabbing the Oyster written in aid of Childline I questioned why it is that our elected representatives are incapable of pre-empting problems and incapable of addressing issues of national importance. I outlined how positive action may impinge on a politician’s popularity in their local area and ultimately cost them votes. This has led us to the regrettable situation whereby political gombeenmen who place personal ambition and party loyalty ahead of national progress are in charge of the destiny of this nation.

To illustrate my point here are some quotes from some of our most senior policy makers:

- “Fianna Fáil is the party of vision, energy and ideas not the passive inheritors of events. “We are the history makers!” 

- “Bank of Ireland shares are € 3.80 today. Now if I meet you here next year, or the year after, do you seriously think Bank of Ireland shares will be € 3.80? I'd go out and buy Bank of Ireland shares, that's what I'd do"

- “The public are entitled to have an absolute guarantee of the financial probity and integrity of their elected representatives, their officials and above all of Ministers. They need to know that they are under financial obligations to nobody”  “The boom is getting boomier”   

- “There “is no place for politically motivated attempts to talk down the economy and the achievements of our people across all sectors. I don't know how people who engage in that don't commit suicide because frankly the only thing that motivates me is being able to actively change something,"  Some real gems from the man who wins money on horses: Bertie Ahern.                                   

- “I think it is fair to say that 2007 represents a turning point for the Irish economy”    - “However, we must not lose sight of the fact that the fundamentals of the economy are still good”                                                                                           

- “As long as I am running this Government I will run the Government as I see fit...as I believe in, based on my philosophy”  Brian Cowen                                               

- “I think it's important to say that when it comes to the appropriate timing, then that will happen but that's not to say that we don't have a hands-on approach in the interim”.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: 4 February 2010

Another Fairy Story

While walking down the street one day, a Government who Minister we'll just call ‘Himself’, is tragically hit by a truck and dies. His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance. Welcome to Heaven, says Peter. Before we let you in I must explain that there appears to be a little problem. We seldom see any member of your party much less a minister around these parts, you so we're not sure what to do with you.

No problem just let me in said himself. Well I'd like to but I have orders from God said Peter. What we'll do is have you spend one day in Hell and one in Heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity. Well I've made up my mind. I want to be in Heaven I have gotten rather used to the good life and want to keep it that way said himself.

I'm sorry but rules are rules said Peter and he promptly escorts himself to the lift and he goes all the way down to Hell. The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a very green golf course in glorious sunshine. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it drinking champagne are many of his former party friends and other hangers on who had worked with him over the years. Everyone is very happy and so is himself because these were his kind of people. They run to greet him, hug him, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at expense of the people. Someone even told the NAMA joke. They play a friendly game of golf and then enjoy a sumptuous meal with much fine wine and brandy. Many stories are told about all the strokes pulled by himself over the years and the fun they all had on the gravy train. They just couldn’t understand how the people could be so gullible.  It was all a great laugh.

The Devil is organising everything, he seems a very friendly guy who has a good time as well drinking pints, singing songs and telling jokes. They all promise himself that he will have a great time if he votes to stay with them. They are having such a good time that time passes quickly and soon it is time to go.  He returns up the lift and the door reopens on Heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him. Another 24 hours is spent with himself joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. These were all people and surprisingly they too have a good time. Himself does not feel truly comfortable, it is as if he does not fit in. Soon he realises it his time in heaven is up. Peter then told him that he had spent a day in hell and another in heaven now is the time vote for where he wished to spend his eternity.

Well, said himself heaven has been really good, but I think I would be better off with my own people. I think I am more suited to hell. So Saint Peter brings him to the elevator and he goes down to Hell. Suddenly the doors of the elevator open and he is in the middle of a large barren rocky unproductive field covered with waste and rubbish and many many cracked and potholed roads. Badly designed houses with leaky roofs and dirty walls are everywhere and the sense of desolation and decay is palpable.

He sees all his former friends dressed in rags and picking up the rubbish and putting it in black plastic bags. They look old, defeated and hungry.  The Devil shouts at himself - Hey big-shot get back to work, that is if you can remember what work is!"
I don't understand he said yesterday there was a golf course and a clubhouse and we ate delicious food and we had pints and danced and had a great time all for free.

Now all there is a wasteland full of rubbish, everyone is miserable and it does not look like it will recover for a long long time. The Devil looks at him and says, I have taken a leaf out of your political manifesto. Yesterday we were campaigning for your vote but today we have it. It was all an illusion, now get back to work!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: January 28 2010

The Secret

Q: When is a secret not a secret?   

A: When it is private.

Strange logic indeed, some would even say ridiculous logic. In the context in which it was offered John Gormally was struggling to answer a question from Pat Kenny as to why the enquiry into the banking situation was being held in secret. It would be regarded as a valid question but it was one that Minister Gormally was unable to answer.  Minister Gormally responded with the unbelievably illogical: "It will not be secret, it will be held in private.”

I thought that some formal definitions might be helpful understand this logic. So here goes. Secret: done, made, or conducted without the knowledge of others - kept from the knowledge of any but the initiated or privileged. Private: personal and not publicly expressed. - Removed from or out of public view or knowledge.
 

Spot any difference? No, neither did I. The enquiry is to be held in private and in secret because in this case they are one and the same thing. The banking enquiry will be worthless because its aim is not to get at the truth of why the banks acted as they did and who is accountable but to be seen to apparently investigate the issue to appease the public.

Even Brian Lenihan is on record as saying “These enquiries are not being established to investigate the present Governments response to the crisis” So what exactly is it being established to investigate? We all know that there existed an unhealthy relationship between certain builders, certain bankers and certain members and parties in the Oireachtas. This gives credence to the suspicion that there existed an unholy alliance between the financial institutions, developers and Government. We also know that Government facilitated the property bubble with ill-advised tax breaks and economically deficient policy. We know too that 40% of Fianna Fáil revenues over the last decade emanated from property developers. We know a lot but we do not know the complete story. Are we not entitled to this information?

The only sure fire way to clarify the situation and remove suspicion would be to hold a transparent and public enquiry. A public enquiry that includes a full- scale investigation into the activity of Government in this sorry fiasco would be in the personal interest of anybody in Government with no case to answer. It would ensure that they would be absolved of complicity or blame assuming of course that they are not complicit in or responsible for the situation.  That they insist on holding an investigation behind closed doors only fuels the public’s suspicion that they are responsible for the economic and banking collapse. Why are they hiding this information?

The bottom line is that we need a full public enquiry. If the Government are not responsible for the banking problems they should welcome such a process. If they are responsible then their ineptitude should be exposed for what it is. Either way the integrity of the Oireachtas is at stake and the democratic process deserves better.

The nation is at an economic precipice and there is a possibility it may never recover and yet the very people that have allegedly been complicit in this sorry situation do not deem it necessary to ensure that such an investigation is undertaken in the public interest and in a clear, fair and transparent manner. These people are paid by the public purse and yet feel entitled to deny the same public access to the truth. This situation stinks.

The extent to which Government was involved in the banking collapse might never be truly uncovered. The happenings of the night of the bank guarantee are also conveniently omitted from this enquiry, as is the role played by certain individuals from the banking world and of course the extent of the involvement of Government.

Ultimately this enquiry will be worthless as a means to uncover responsibility. It is simply an exercise in political self-preservation. This is a cover up of enormous proportions at the expense of those that have had their lives ruined. In the fullness of time it will be exposed for the sham that it is. I only hope by then it in not too late.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: January 21 2010

Send home the clowns …

As with the recent flooding crisis we are now faced with governmental ineptitude and inaction in dealing with the current cold snap. Although this weather was forecasted it would appear that they hoped that it would quickly thaw thus saving them from the onerous task of doing their jobs. They just do not seem to grasp the importance of immediate and decisive action on any level.

Their delay in co-ordinating a response is inexcusable, their eventual response inadequate and their energy markedly absent. Why was someone not tasked with spearheading a coordinated response earlier than this? Why did on being appointed as Minister for Snow and Sleet did John Gormally immediately claim that he had no authority over local Government. This was astonishing statement. It would be regarded as inept management and passing the buck in most normal organisations that understand the concept of accountability to its stakeholders. Our Government is obviously not a normal organisation.

Immediate action should have been taken. It is unacceptable that many elderly and vulnerable people still remain trapped in their homes unable to communicate with the outside world. Yet it has taken three weeks for Government to assign someone to deal with the problem. The cold spell had run for 20 days by the time the grandly titled ‘national emergency response committee’ was eventually announced in the face of fierce public criticism. Is it not more than a little coincedental that the response only came after significant snowfalls occur in Dublin, grinding the city to a halt when the west and north-west have been in crisis for almost three weeks? A typically parochial response underlining the philosophy that it is only an emergency when it occurs inside the pale.

When a general election is called the political establishment utilise an impressive database of all people of voting age within their constituencies. Names, ages, occupations etc are all available and this detailed data is utilised with great speed to maximise the potential vote. These highly coordinated campaigns would be operable within 24 hours. This energy is evident when politicians want something from the people. Where is this same energy when the people need help? Why does it take three weeks for Government to even acknowledge the serious nature of a problem?

Meanwhile a Minister with key responsibility for transport infrastructure relaxed on a beach in Malta as the country delved deeper into distress. He actually claimed that he was not needed to manage the problem. This begs the question if he is not needed during a crisis such as this then why do we need him at all?

This lack of accountibility, passing of the buck, overall poor management and non-existant leadership has ensured that those given the mandate to represent us are clearly unwilling or unable to take charge of the country at a critical time. Passing the buck is par for the course in the Ireland of today and the concept of accountability is notably absent in public life. Many of those elected to represent the people have abdicated their responsibilities on a grand scale.

Dealing with shortages of grit and rock salt, distributing food and fuel and clearing roads and footpaths should not be the stuff of a national crisis. Have our national capabilities actually regressed to a situation that Government cannot even cope with a prolonged frost? The state has the resources to sort out these problems. They have the resources but they do not have the resolve. Theirin lies the problem.

Many struggling businesses have experienced a wholly avoidable collapse in income because of this fiasco. Jobs are once again put at risk. We need the roads and streets cleared and airports opened if businesses are to operate properly. Paradoxically the state will lose VAT, Income and other taxes and face higher social welfare payments as yet more businesses face closure primarily because our country is managed by a motley collection of distinctly unfunny clowns.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: January 7 2010

In The Public Interest…

I have been critical of the lethargy and inactivity of this Government in dealing with the economic crises. I also disagree with Brian Lenihan on a host of issues not least of which is the potential debacle that is NAMA, however, I could never accuse him of inactivity. He has without doubt been proactive in his attempts to curb the economic recession. I may fundamentally disagree with him on many issues but I respect the fact that he alone in the current cabinet continues to face up to the current crises with focussed energy and determination. If his colleagues acted with a similar sense of drive and purpose we would all be in a much healthier economic position.

There is also no doubt that Brian Lenihan has worked hard in fulfilling his duties as a public servant. Given his efforts over the past year and the pressures he worked under I believe he was entitled to spend the Christmas period privately and at peace with his family. This is a simple courtesy that is extended to everybody in all positions, hardworking or otherwise. After all it is supposedly the season of peace and goodwill to all men.

As it happens he had more reason than most to wish to spend a peaceful, quiet and uninterrupted Christmas with is family as he just received some devastating news regarding his personal health. He allegedly received a call from a TV3 representative on Christmas Eve informing him that in 48 hours they were going to broadcast his private health affairs to the nation. This they claimed to be in the public interest. They obviously did not care one iota about his personal interests or that of his family.

How was this ham-fisted attempt at sensational broadcasting one-upmanship in the public interest? Dáil Eireann, the world’s stock exchanges, the international money markets and all international political and economic activity was in recess. Absolutely no political, economic or social agenda was served by breaking this news in that manner and at that particular time. Why also would a medical professional compromise his reputation by commenting on the matter in the manner that he did? Surely extending some common courtesy to an ill man and his family by holding this ‘news’ item would not have compromised the public interest in any way.

The reality is that the only interest that was served was the selfish self-interest of TV3 in its race to get a scoop during a low news period. Some scoop! No thought was given to journalistic or personal integrity or to the sensibilities of a family in turmoil. The management of TV3 must be so proud.

The personal health of the Minister for Finance is certainly a matter of major importance to us all especially in the current economic climate. We need to know that he is in a position to properly fulfil his professional duties just as the health of the CEO of a public company is of importance to its shareholders. The crucial issue is not do we have a right to know but in what manner, when and on what terms should we have been informed.

Does a journalist have the right to contact a man as is alleged in this case and give him an ultimatum? Does he have the right to wrap this discourtesy in the cloak of serving the public interest? Am I alone in believing that a line was crossed in this instance and that an apology is merited?

We may not think that Brian Lenihan is making all the right decisions. We may not think that this Government are competent enough to deal with the current economic problems. But what we think about the professional competence of any elected representative is irrelevant when it comes to their personal lives. Ultimately they and their families are entitled to the same compassion, courtesy and basic good manners that are due to all other sectors of society.

The manner of this intrusion into Brian Lenihan’s most private affairs coupled with the amateur and insensitive reporting of the matter has done a major disservice to the media in Ireland.  That most people were offended by the manner of the handling of this news item indicates that we are still an inherently decent society that will not tolerate being dragged through the gutter by the baser elements within the media.

With luck Brian Lenihan will make a complete recovery. Meanwhile TV3 will struggle for a long time to regain its reputation.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: December 23 2009

The Controlling Partner

As we face into Christmas we can look back on a year that was economically challenging to say the least. The facts of the matter are simple. We currently spend around €52 Bn but bring in a little over €30 Bn. To fund this spending excess we are borrowing €500 million per week. That this situation cannot continue is beyond doubt.

Our economic policy is constrained by EU membership. The only tools available to us are either raising tax revenues or cutting spending. Government is currently pursuing both strategies. Given that we cannot argue with the mathematics of the situation I am surprised that the relevant interest groups cannot understand that we all must play our part. We need to act as part of a national team. The simple truth is that no individual sector or interest group is immune from the consequences of this recession. It is our collective problem.

Yet we see the leaders of the supposed ‘Social Partners’ in serious conflict with Government, with each other and significantly with economic reality. Each insists their members must not suffer even if their protection is at the expense of the country as a whole. Their members represent a tiny subsection of our society. They do not care for or represent the people of this country as a whole because that is not their job. Their job is to control national fiscal policy to meet their member’s objectives irrespective of who gets caught in the crossfire. The national interest is not their responsibility and they do not pretend to be part of any national team. That is not part of their brief.

It reminds me of a little story about the human body that underlines the need for teamwork. All the organs of the body could not agree on anything. Each wanted to be the boss and to make its own rules. They could never agree as to what to do or who should be the boss.

The stomach thought because it digested the food it must be the boss. The brain said since I control the body parts I must be the boss. The eyes explained since I can see everything I must be the boss. The legs countered, since I take the body everywhere, I must be the boss. Then the arsehole butted in and said, since I let the body live by excreting all the waste, I must be the boss. None of the body parts agreed and the arsehole got angry and refused to do any work. Soon the whole body began to get sick. The brain got foggy, the legs wobbled, the eyes got crossed and the stomach got sick. Soon the entire body died all because an arsehole was determined to get its own way, whatever the consequences.

The body died because one organ thought its agenda was more important than the common good. I note some striking parallels between this body and the grouping loosely referred to as the ‘Social Partners’. It is time some of them faced the reality current situation and acknowledged the role they must play in our national recovery. Personal ambition, political and personal hostilities and downright bloody mindedness at the public expense are certainly not the platform from which any form of partnership could succeed.

If we are to successfully negotiate the current crises we must all play a part however unpalatable that may be. Conflict between public or private sectors, employed and unemployed or between rich and poor will not allow us to recover. We are in an economic war and we must approach that war with a common vision, a common purpose and with one voice. We must act as part of a team. Through teamwork and collective commitment we can take control of our own destiny.

Post Script: I have had much fun writing this column through the past year. I have received a large amount of positive feedback on the column so thank you for that.  On this special week I would like to take the opportunity to wish everyone a peaceful and happy Christmas and all you may wish for in 2010.  If we approach the coming year with confidence, competence and maturity we can turn the corner. But we must do it together.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: December 17 2009

The Christmas Party

There are many who feel that last weeks budget is unfair and that it scapegoats the lower paid and those in the public sector whilst maintaining the privileged position of those that earn substantially greater sums. However there is an equally valid case to be made against increasing taxes on higher paid private sector workers. This thesis states that if we continue to increase taxes on those that create employment or the wealth creators they will simply cease to trade or leave the country leading to economic stagnation for the economy as a whole.  The evidence would support this thesis. Given the season that’s in it lets take the Christmas party as an illustration.

Suppose that ten workmen go out for Christmas drinks and the bill for all ten comes to €100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay €1. The sixth would pay €3. The seventh would pay €7. The eighth would pay €12. The ninth would pay €18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay €59. In the fiscal parlance this would be both equitable and progressive so that's what they decided to do.

The ten men intended to party for the twelve days of Christmas and seemed quite happy with the arrangement. Then the bar owner decided to give them a Christmas present by reducing the cost of their beer by €20. Drinks for the ten now cost just€80 each evening.

They still wanted to be both equitable and progressive and pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men still drank for free. However the other six men were in a quandary as to how could they divide the €20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? €20 divided by six was €3.33 but if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So it was suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount.

The fifth man like the first four now paid nothing (100% savings). The sixth now paid €2 instead of €3 (33% savings). The seventh now pay €5 instead of €7 (28% savings). The eighth now paid €9 instead of €12 (25% savings). The ninth now paid €14 instead of €18 (22% savings). The tenth now paid €49 instead of €59 (16% savings). Each was better off and the first four still enjoyed free drinks.

Then they began to compare their savings. I only got one Euro out of the €20 declared the sixth man but he got €10 pointing at the tenth man. Yes said the fifth man I only saved one Euro too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I did!  Why should he get €10 back when I got only €2 said the seventh man?  We didn't get anything at all said the first four. This system is unfair it exploits the poor!

Then the nine men attacked the tenth man and he ran away. The nine men sat down to party without him and they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill! Without the wealthy man they couldn’t continue to party.

And that is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a 20% tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they might run away altogether taking their money with them leaving a gaping hole in our collective finances.

Equitable taxation has long been an emotive issue and will continue to be so. It is a difficult balancing act and needs careful management. The vulnerable must be protected and everyone must pay equally according to his means. This is essential.

But to target the high earner just because he is a high earner without examining his overall contribution may just cause more problems than it will solve. We should not target any one sector of our society, rich or poor in the public or private sector simply because they exist. That would be inequitable and we a just taxation system must be equitable above all else. This is the socio-economic challenge we really face. We must all face it together.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: December 10 2009

Suffer little children

I was educated in a diocesan seminary during the 1980s. I was lucky to have been taught by some priests who were amongst the most dedicated and competent teaching personnel in the country. These people were above reproach of any kind and were and are a credit to their professions. Their colleagues and their superiors have failed these priests and many more like them. Their legacy has been tarnished by a systemic cover-up of crimes of such magnitude that they are the subject of scrutiny and comment all over the world.

Such was the hold the Catholic church had over the country even the authorities were complicit in the cover-ups by their inability or unwillingness to address the issue of child abuse, paedophilia, rape, unbelievable torture and many deaths. The state was afraid to punish the perpetrators of the worst criminal acts of violence in our history. They did nothing, the bishops and church hierarchy did nothing and the suffering continued unabated. All in the name of God.

That the church would not address the issue underlines their personal commitment to maintaining their rigid and authoritarian grip over the people in every walk of life. Their primary motivation was power and money — precisely the same motivations as the worst dictators and megalomaniacs in history. I do not believe it to be a bridge too far to compare these atrocities and the mindset of the perpetrators to that of Nazi Germany or other corrupt, torturous tyrannies around the world. They engaged in torture and death on a massive scale with the support of the relevant authorities. Striking parallels with many elements of the Catholic Church in Ireland.

That these people espoused Christian values and professed a doctrine of love thy neighbour makes this issue all the more poignant. The hypocrisy of the Church and the acquiescence of the state in the rape, torture and worse bring a shame on the Ireland of the time and on all involved.

That we today do not make the perpetrators pay a price that is owed by criminals such as these brings a shame on the Ireland we now live in. These people are not priests of God; they abdicated the right to that title long ago. They are violent criminals, rapists and killers. They have destroyed lives without care for their victims, without care for their colleagues and without care for God.

Nor are they men of God; they are men of evil and should bear the same responsibilities and punishments as other men of evil. Rapists and murderers are rightly reviled by the general population and when caught face the full rigours of the law. It should be no different in this case.

Why is it that we have accepted the insincere apologies and the payment of a paltry stipend in lieu of serious punishment for the offenders and those that colluded in the cover-ups as acceptable? It is simply not enough.

This was a systemic, powerful and organised paedophile ring. Nothing more and nothing less. Paedophile rings are the subjects of intense investigation around the world and when a ring is broken the culprits are severely punished. This is as it should be.

We in Ireland have been duped for years by a paedophile ring of enormous proportions, facilitated by its superiors, supported by the state and financed by the public. It has compromised the entire Catholic organisation in this country and the Church will in all likelihood never recover. Nor should it, as it too must be held accountable as an organisation.

These evil people have undermined all the good works undertaken by a large number of people such as the priests who taught me. It is not just the abusers themselves but the people who facilitated in the cover-up that are criminals. If justice exists in our society all of these people must pay a heavy personal penalty. Their victims deserve this justice, the innocent public deserve justice and their honest hard working colleagues who had no part in the abuse or cover-up deserve justice. They deserve to have their good names restored and their vocations to be untainted by this horror.

Accountability and serious personal punishment is the only place to start. Evildoers must be punished. After as someone once said, all that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: November 26 2009

A Smart Economy Needs Smart People

As the world comes out of recession Ireland is rapidly moving into depression. How is it that other countries are now in recovery and we are not?  If it were true that Ireland is simply the victim of the international economic collapse then we would also be emerging from the economic downturn. Instead we have not yet experienced the worst of the problems because those tasked with dealing with the recession are incapable of understanding its magnitude much less of dealing with it.

One thing is definite and that is that economic recovery cannot be achieved through fiscal and budgetary measures alone without addressing the issue of unemployment. We have been fed much emotive political rhetoric about employment creation through special task forces and the development of a smart economy but the evidence suggests otherwise

For example is it not unbelievable that the Government task force on unemployment has met just once since its creation last January.  One meeting in almost a year!  How can they justify such lethargy? The Government then say they cannot afford to implement most of the recommendations from the Mid West Regional Taskforce. This position conflicts with the spin offered by Mary Coughlan and Willie O’Dea last Christmas and insults the integrity of all unemployed people. The reality is that they cannot afford not to. The creation of employment must become a priority.

Then there is the proposed development of our smart economy. This is political opportunism at its best. The reality is that Ireland is nowhere close to developing a smart economy. Outside of the obvious physical infrastructural deficits we have a marked deficit of talent in as far as we do not have enough scientists coming through with smart research projects. This cannot be addressed in the short term. We currently produce seven PhD’s per 1000 people whereas the OECD average is twelve PhD’s per 1000 people. Our third level and fourth level educational output is not sufficient for the needs of a knowledge economy.

The pipeline at second level is also showing serious deficiencies as we have only 16% of students taking higher-level maths, 10% taking higher chemistry and 8% taking higher physics. The raw material is simply not being developed. Yet IDA figures show that 40% of all deals done in 2008 involved research and development. We cannot compete with the OECD nations because to put it simply we are not developing enough smart people?

We have real and serious reasons to be concerned. The Minister overseeing employment is clueless and the statutory bodies tasked with employment creation are in chaos. FAS lack leadership; strategic direction and moral in the ranks is exceptionally low. This is shameful because many competent and professional people in the organisation have been failed by those at the top who have been gorging on the fruits of financial excess and mismanagement.

Enterprise Ireland operates in a world that has changed radically in the last eighteen months but its terms of reference remain the same as during the boom times. Surely a redeveloped strategic plan involving re-training, re-motivating and re-deploying its executives should be in place. Another excellent public organisation is hamstrung by Government.

Likewise the IDA is fighting a losing battle in the bid to attract foreign direct investment mainly due to our uncompetitive economy, infrastructural and intellectual deficits and damaged reputation. Údarás Na Gaeltachta faces closure in spite of an excellent track record of achievement. Similarly the highly successful City and County Enterprise Boards are unsure of their fate. They are vastly under-resourced even though they have proven themselves to be highly successful in creating jobs and are net revenue generators for Government.

These are the institutions that create employment. They are the forgotten heroes in the battle of job creation but their effectiveness is compromised by abject political ineptitude and economic mismanagement.  The bottom line is that the unemployed are being neglected by the lack of a creative and cohesive strategy. When there is no real plan, no real strategy and no ability to address the issue how can we possibly expect results?

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: November 19 2009

Is left right?

The Irish political landscape has in the main been dominated by the position our forefathers have taken in relation to the civil war and the left, who follow a socialist driven Labour agenda. If this socialist rhetoric were to be believed both centre parties Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil promote a neo-liberal agenda that aims to deliver wealth for the few at the expense of the majority.

Neo-liberalism is an economic school of thought that blends liberal political views with an emphasis on economic growth. Its opponents often use the term pejoratively. I am one of the people that believe that an equitable society can only be achieved through economic development. A country can only protect its most vulnerable if it can afford to do so through taxes levied on wealth.

That the political establishment has failed in Ireland is not a fault of the economic system; rather it is a result of the incompetence of successive Governments and their inability or unwillingness to use the tax revenues to achieve maximum benefit. Our taxes have apparently been utilised to gain maximum political advantage and to fund lifestyles of greed and excess for a chosen few. That we condoned such nefarious activities is an indictment of the political system rather than being evidence that the economic system was incorrect.

Capitalism it is said provides for an unequal distribution of wealth. This is true but unlike socialism it does generate wealth and it provides for a fund to redistribute a portion of those riches throughout society. It is not perfect and does not adequately address the imbalances in society. Nor does socialism. The evidence for this is available in all of the former socialist countries and many of the people from the EU accession states resident in Ireland will bear testimony to the fact that socialism is a failed doctrine.

We need capitalism because our society needs to generate wealth. To do this we need to foster free enterprise and reward the risk-takers. This can only be achieved if it is driven by the promise of profit. It does ensure that some people become wealthy and some people remain poor. It also rewards initiative and hard work. Successful entrepreneurs also create employment, without them we would have no employers, no jobs and no tax revenue.

The socialist agenda is an admirable theory but its fundamental flaws undermine its possibility of success. This is best explained by the following allegory.

A teacher was endeavouring to demonstrate economic theories to her students. She insisted that if socialism worked no one would be poor and no one would be rich. Everyone would get the same regardless of effort, a great equaliser. So she held an experiment in class whereby all results would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade.

After the first test, the results were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided there was no point so too they studied a little less.

The second test average was a D. Now no one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. It was obvious that no one would study extra hard for the benefit of anyone else. The element of greed and selfishness in human nature undermined a great theory but ensured that it failed in practice. So it is with socialism and the Labour driven agenda.

It will ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. As someone once said socialism is only workable in heaven where it isn’t needed or in hell where they have got it.

Social policies help create an equitable society in a properly functioning economy. But to get the economy back on track we need to foster enterprise and the creation of jobs. We must also ensure that its tax revenues are equitably levied and fairly redistributed so that efficient social services are available to all. This is where we have failed in the past and we must not let it happen again.

But first we must create wealth in our economy. The creation of jobs through the promotional of enterprise should be our first priority. There is no alternative.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: November 12 2009

Drinking and Driving Saves Lives!

Its official! Drinking alcohol before driving will actually enhance road safety. I say its official because a member of Dáil Eireann has endorsed a policy drinking prior to driving. This strategy came from Mattie McGrath TD for Tipp South when he made the following astonishing comments on national radio “people say that after one drink it lessens your concentration – you’re not as good a driver, or you’re not able to drive. I don’t accept that. That can be argued the other way as well…., it can make people who are jumpy on the road or are nervous be more relaxed”

So there you have it. Mattie knows better than the leading international evidence, and he only needs to rely on gut instinct. Imagine the extent of his contribution if he engaged his brain instead of his gut from time to time.

Given Mattie’s absurd logic should we not encourage all of our learner drivers to have a drink or two before they commence driving? After all first time and learner drivers are apt to be nervous so a few drinks will help them relax and become better drivers. Perhaps we should encourage them to have a few drinks before taking their driving test as well. This appears to be the reasoning of an elected member of parliament. It is in my opinion the logic of an imbecile. The people of Tipperary south must be so proud.

Mattie McGrath TD is just the most vocal of a group of politicians from across all political parties who have jumped onto this particular bandwagon. That Government has capitulated to this interest group is a lesson in abject political cowardice. It brings shame on them and statistics indicate it will in all probability cost lives.

Two interest groups apparently drive this curious agenda. The first are the Vintners who wield significant influence over the current political establishment. They have their personal commercial interests at heart and are at least somewhat transparent about promoting this agenda. The second are a group of politicians who profess to represent the lonely and marginalised people in rural areas. In reality they too are looking to protect their personal self-interest albeit in a less transparent manner, which involves utilising, and trivialising one of Irelands greatest human tragedies.

Many elderly rural Irish people suffer from loneliness and isolation. They need human contact and they need care to ensure that they have transport to shops or medical care and that they have access to sufficient quantities of food and heat and other such life essentials. This problem simply cannot be adequately addressed by a weekly visit to the pub for a couple of baby Powers. For our elected representatives to utilise the drink driving debate as a ploy to appear to address this problem is disingenuous, selfish and cowardly.

We should also note that the debate is exclusively centred around isolated elderly gentlemen, as they are the ones most likely to use the local pub. What about isolated and lonely elderly women? Who has even considered their needs in this whole silly debate?

The issue of the provision rural transport especially for isolated and lonely people is a serious and urgent one. But it should not be confused with road safety legislation that aims only to bring Ireland into line with the majority of European nations. The reduction in drink driving limits if rigorously and visibly enforced will certainly save lives so it should be enacted in its entirety. That it has been redrafted in a compromised or watered down format indicates the skewed value systems of Government. Protecting ones seat at any cost.

It is not acceptable that people with a selfish agenda are willing to gamble with people’s lives while they stay mute and ineffective in the backbenches on the issue of rural isolation and other serious socio-economic issues.  It is a shame on them for using the terrible plight of many isolated and lonely people to further their own ends.

Protecting ones seat at the expense of common sense and good legislation is the cause of many of our current problems. Surely it is time for all politicians across all parties to put the people first. After all we put them first we gave them their political mandate; surely it is time to demand political payback.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: November 5 2009

A Nation At War

SIPTU claim there will be a "civil war" in Ireland between ordinary workers whom they claim are being asked to pay for this recession and the high earners whom they claim are eager to stay out of the tax net and avoid paying their share. SIPTU does not define what an ordinary worker is nor does it justify how it can represent workers in the private sector including the well paid and the unemployed and represent workers in a public sector who cannot lose their jobs.

I respect the position of people trying to protect their financial position but I cannot respect the public sector union leaders when they threaten us with strikes and a (metaphorical I hope) civil war. What exactly qualifies one as a high earner anyhow? Just so I know whom to shoot at when the civil war starts!

Given that the ordinary worker earns an average industrial wage of €32,000 per annum I assume a salary of €100,000 would be regarded as a high earner and someone with a salary in excess of €150,000 would easily be what these guys refer to as a fat cat. Ordinary workers rightly object to paying for the fat cats, and yet they willingly to do so every week. 

According to a recent article in The Irish Times John Carr of the INTO has a salary of €172,000 while Peter McLoone of Impact has a salary of €171,313. David Begg of ICTU has a salary of €137,400, he earns an additional €27,700 from his work as a director of the Central Bank and as a Governor of the Irish Times trust.  John White of the ASTI has a salary of €144,000 while Peter MacMenamin of the TUI is paid according to a grade system between €131,748 and €150,712.  Jack O’Connor of SIPTU earned €124,895 before expenses in 2008. Larry Broderick of the IBOA earned €133,518 with pension contributions of €46,731 and car, bonus, VHI benefits that totalled a further €19,957. His total package is apparently €200,206.

So what have these particular fat cats have got more in common with the ordinary workers they claim to represent? Absolutely nothing.

For example David Begg is also a director of the ESRI, a public body in conflict with the Trade Union movement, which has shown that public sector workers earn on average 25% more than a private sector counterpart. He is also a director of all three Irish Times companies and sits on the boards of the Central Bank and Aer Lingus.

That a Union official would sit at an Aer Lingus directors meeting where 676 are to lose their jobs and the remaining staff are to take a 10% cut without walking out is astonishing. What is his function and why was he appointed? 

Peter McLoone was Chairman of FAS as well as being General Secretary of the Trade Union - Impact. Countless other Trade Union representatives are on many different boards providing them with generous compensation.  Surely this is inappropriate.

If we rightly expect our politicians to resign when they find themselves compromised then surely union leaders should do likewise?

How can these people be taken seriously when they have absolutely nothing in common with the very people they purport to represent? Is there a vested and private agenda of protecting their personal positions at all costs? I believe that they relish a situation of confrontation and conflict as it justifies their very expensive existence to their members.

If there exists any justification in the Public Vs Private sector debate it primarily exists between the PAYE workers and the public sector frontline staff on the one hand; and the vast army of non-productive unnecessary personnel in the quangos and many other state organisations on the other.

This is the crux of the public sector expenditure debate but is purposefully ignored by the union leaders because it does not fit in with their personal agendas.

Thousands of unnecessary and ineffective pen pushers and bureaucrats exist in the public sector and hide behind the frontline staff. These frontline staff work hard in difficult circumstances with few resources. A deadweight administrative workforce that has no purpose, compromises them and thus their position on this issue is undermined.

It is the vast numbers of superfluous administrative staff throughout the public sector who should pay the price for this recession. With their jobs!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: October 29 2009

Dear Taoiseach

An Taoiseach.

Mr Brian Cowen TD.

Department of the Taoiseach,

Leinster House,

Dublin 2.

A Chara,

As an Irish citizen I am concerned about the state of our economy. As you are our Taoiseach I hoped you could clarify a few matters for me.

At the start of this decade Ireland had great wealth, which has now disappeared. How did this happen? You were Minister for Finance during the relevant period but I assume that you were not responsible because you have since been promoted and in most normal countries people that cause such serious problems do not get promoted. Actually they get fired. So who exactly holds responsibility for this sorry mess?

We entrusted you to regulate the financial services sector. You appointed a Financial Regulator but he failed abysmally to do his job. Why then was he let retire with huge pension entitlements and who was responsible for overseeing his work? I was told that he was answerable to you but this must not be the case. After all this would mean that you were not doing your job and in every normal country people that do not do their jobs do not get promoted. They get fired. So who was responsible for overseeing the financial regulator?

During your time as Minister for Finance the nature of our tax revenue changed dramatically. It became overly reliant on transaction taxes such as stamp duty on the sale of property and VRT from the sale of motor vehicles. Anyone with even a basic grasp of economics would have noticed that the exchequer returns were absolutely out of proportion to the revenues generated from a healthy economy. Obviously this was not your fault since you were subsequently promoted and I know that in most normal countries people that make such serious errors never get promoted. They get fired. So whose fault was it?

During this period the public sector wage bill doubled and increased by a multiple of the rate of inflation. Why? It is rumoured that your party used the façade of social partnership to use public money to buy votes but I do not believe that. It would be highly unethical and out of order. It should certainly preclude anyone involved from being promoted and since you subsequently became Taoiseach I assume such rumours could not possibly be true.

It is a great honour to be appointed Taoiseach. How does one qualify for such an exalted position? I thought perhaps one would be appointed as a result of significant and quantifiable achievements in the prior positions they have held. This is the case for all senior positions in industry so I assume this also holds true in political life. Strangely enough I cannot find any record of any significant or quantifiable achievements throughout your career as a TD, or in seven different ministries or as Táiniste. Am I missing something?

I know that you threw in the towel as Minister for Health and referred it as to being ‘like Angola - full of landmines’. This could be seen as acapitulation and a failure by you so I assume you must have really excelled in the other portfolios you have held. After all you were subsequently promoted and I know that in a normal country the people that fail in their positions do not get promoted. They get fired. So what exactly qualifies you to be Taoiseach?

To be given such immense responsibility one would expect you to  be eminently qualified and highly experienced with an obvious track record of significant and quantifiable achievement. This is the case in any normal country and it is reasonable to assume that it should be the case in Ireland. Otherwise how could we possibly have credibility in international markets.

As you hold the destiny of my children in your hands I would sincerely appreciate a prompt reply to the above questions.

Le gach dea ghui, Mise le meas,

A Concerned Citizen.

PS: If you find time maybe you could outline the criteria you use in evaluating and appointing your ministers as it appears that experience, competence and motivation do not feature high on the list of requirements. What exactly do you have to do to become a minister?

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: October 22 2009

Full Circle: Easter 1913

What need you, being come to sense,
But fumble in a greasy till
And add the halfpence to the pence
And prayer to shivering prayer, until
You have dried the marrow from the bone?
For men were born to pray and save:
Romantic Ireland's dead and gone,
It's with O'Leary in the grave.

Easter 1913 - WB Yeats

I learnt this poem in school. It portrays the merchant class of the time as greedy and mercenary concerned only with the accumulation of wealth. Personal values and integrity take second place. Almost one hundred years later as we approach 2013 little has changed. This mindset has probably destroyed our economy and possibly our society. This situation has arisen because of our tacit acceptance of low standards, professional ineptitude and financial excess in public office.

Our politicians, our bankers and senior public servants were appointed by us to ensure we maintained a balance in our society. Many have used their positions for personal self-enrichment and lavish lifestyles. They have not done their jobs. We are complicit in this sorry tale of greed because we have done nothing about it. We all know of people in public life who live a lifestyle that is not in proportion to their abilities, positions or their income. We have not demanded accountability and we often re-elect or reappoint the culprits. Ultimately we ourselves are to blame for allowing this situation to develop.

In his resignation speech John O Donoghue last week repeatedly asserted that he broke no law and was entitled to due process. Therein lies the problem. As he broke no law he should not need due process. He affirmed that he was aware that his behaviour was unacceptable when he tried to use the ‘I broke no law’ defence.  He was never accused of breaking any law. He was accused of indulging in wanton waste profligacy and excessive spending at the public’s expense. Of that he is guilty as charged.                

He and many more of his ilk do not understand that there is a moral imperative to act with reasonable restraint. They do not recognise the concept of a moral imperative because they do not appreciate the concept of accountability. He was complicit in the making of the rules that governed his authority to spend such vast amounts of our money. He broke no law in this regard because he and his buddies made these laws. Thus they ensured that accountability did not exist for their personal actions.

This is true throughout the system. People such as Rody Molloy, Seanie Fitzpatrick and Michael Fingleton get obscene severance packages and disappear into a comfortable sunset while their victims are left to pick up the pieces of their shattered lives. They have not been held accountable for their incompetence and ineptitude, on the contrary they were rewarded for it.

John O Donoghue stated that only the people of South Kerry could remove him from office. This was a cynical attempt to announce his future political intentions. He chose the wrong pulpit. It was unethical and self-serving to use the apolitical office of Ceann Comhairle for the purposes of personal electioneering. That he was willing to compromise himself in this manner is proof positive that he had no moral grasp of the significance of his actions.

What kind of society have we fostered when we condone such transgressions on a massive scale. How can we teach our children ethical values and personal morality when they see that those that are supposed to lead by example are concerned only with vested self-interest and personal enrichment?

The symbolism in ‘Easter 1913’ was of the merchant class of the early 1900’s sucking the courage and integrity out of Ireland because all they cared about was money. Almost one hundred years later what have we learnt? The world has suffered five major recessions, two world wars and a man has even walked on the moon. Yet in Ireland the more things change the more they stay the same.

We cannot change the past but we can learn from it. We have a right to expect that those that have failed us while enriching themselves at our expense should pay a heavy penalty.

Let age of accountability be upon us

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: October 15 2009

Conference Call.

We are living in one of the most challenging years we as a society have ever faced. Given the uncertainty of the time it is imperative we devise a commercial strategy to secure Galway’s future. The economy will be financially constrained for a number of years to come and it has become patently obvious that we cannot rely on our Government to save the economy. They themselves have proven this. So realistically we are on our own. We have to make our own plans and crucially we must execute those plans ourselves. Galway must paddle its own canoe so to speak.

In my professional life I work with a wide cross section of businesses helping them develop strategies and plans going forward and then helping them execute those plans.  I always begin by looking at the individual strengths and unique attributes of the organisation. Only then can I evaluate the potential opportunities available in the marketplace.

Galway can list a wealth of strengths not least of which is the positive perception visitors take with them when they leave. This is the catalyst on which we should base our plan for the future. We have a wonderful town. One that can host vast numbers of visitors as evidenced by the Annual Galway races or the recent Volvo Ocean Race. The question is how do we capitalise on this potential on an ongoing year round basis.

Our weather is not a key advantage nor is it a marketable feature. At best it is erratic in summer and often atrocious in winter. We do not attract viable numbers of tourists on a year round basis. We have accepted this as something we cannot change. After all we cannot change the weather or the seasons. But have we been looking at the issue from the wrong perspective?  We cannot change the weather but can we change the profile of the tourist we attract?

Foe example Ireland is not on the international circuit for major conferences because we do not have the facilities capable of hosting major conferences. We do not have a suitable purpose built and modern venue capable of comfortably seating 8,000 people.

This can be addressed. One suggestion would be to redevelop Leisureland. It is an underutilised resource in need of refurbishment and modernisation. Much of this wonderful site is wasted on a funfair. Funfairs such as this do not attract high-end high-spend international clients. If we were to completely redevelop this site into a major conference centre with an Olympic sized swimming pool we could have a facility in a location without peer in Europe. Its potential contribution to the local economy is enormous.  It could be an iconic building, one that becomes Galway’s signature in similar fashion to Sydney’s opera house.

Imagine Galway with all of its intrinsic charm and attributes with an international state of the art conference centre. We could rapidly become an unbeatable destination as a conference location. Such an initiative would provide continued financial stability of all of Galway’s local businesses, drive huge traffic numbers through the airport and ensure that the region prospers on a year round basis.

All of this could be achieved if we were to invest in a major conference venue, which in the greater scheme of things would involve a relatively small investment. Developed in tandem with the proposed redevelopment of the docklands and an eventual light rail system this initiative would transform the face of Galway in ways that we would not even have dreamed of a decade ago. It would further enable Galway to be internationally recognised as one of the truly great cities of the world.

As a community we face immense challenges going forward. How we approach these challenges will define our legacy to our children and grandchildren. Thinking small with parochial self-interest will ensure that we never really conquer the challenges we face going forward. We need a proactive mindset and approach, anything else will simply not allow us compete in such a challenging marketplace.

Thinking on a grand scale might just provide a long-term solution. As Michelangelo once said “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark”.

It is worth bearing in mind!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: October 8 2009

A Winter Of Discontent.

The deliberate polarisation of the public and private sectors has the potential to become a cancerous scourge that may destroy our society for generations to come. If left untreated it will eat our society from within until it destroys it completely. This is potentially the most divisive national issue we have ever faced. It is that serious.  We need a united society if we are to negotiate the current crises and emerge successfully from the economic turmoil. The public and private sector debate is destructive, divisive and hugely emotive because there are valid arguments on both sides.

Government must radically decrease current expenditure. If they do not achieve this then the IMF will do it for them. They will impose cuts in a much more punitive fashion than currently being countenanced and without recourse to anyone. The public sector feels that it is being made the scapegoat for the excesses of a private sector that was out of control, into which they had no input. Both arguments are valid to some degree. This pitching of Public Vs Private sector is divisive only serves the agenda of two interest groups and those groups are happy to let this situation develop. The trade union leaders were not given a strike mandate from their members a few months ago. The promotion of a siege mentality within the ranks of its members serves their personal agenda very well. It gives them a cause. These individuals need to justify their existence. Likewise a weak and incompetent Government are happy to deflect attention away from their growing list of inadequacies. They too are happy to foster this unacceptable situation. If the people are fighting with one another then they might ignore the elephant in the room.

There are some interesting parallels developing between where Ireland is now, and what happened in Britain in the late 1970s. Then as now there was an un-elected Prime Minister called Jim Callaghan with an economy in a serious recession. National debt was growing, unemployment rising, and a general feeling that things were out of control.

Callaghan tried to reach consensus with the unions. But a militant trade union movement caused chaos with strikes and picket line trouble. There were nightly news reports of battles between flying pickets and scabs, rubbish piling up on the streets and wildcat strikes. It was a very ugly time. Civil unrest was rife and the UK as a society has never properly recovered. Nor did the trade union movement. Eventually the public mood swung against the unions. Callaghan publicly questioned "Crisis - what crisis?" This showed him to be well out of touch with the general public sentiment. Striking similarities to Ireland perhaps. People got really fed up with the unions calling strike after strike - when to most people they were perceived as being privileged and cosseted workers.  As the situation drifted further off the tracks Callaghan’s inability to confront the unions made him look weak and fatally undermined his leadership.

The then opposition leader Margaret Thatcher had not really been taken seriously as a possible Prime Minister. The combination of absolute disillusionment with Callaghan coupled with a need for change, any kind of change, meant that Thatcher was elected Prime Minister. She confronted the trade union movement with vigour. She has left a very mixed legacy, not least here in Ireland. But one thing is certain. The trade union movement and English society in general never fully recovered from that turbulent time. We are facing into a remarkably similar time in Ireland. I worry that a few people with vested interests and a selfish agenda will promote militancy, strikes and civil unrest.  Only now are we emerging from civil war politics and the partisan political loyalties that ensued. It would be a disgrace if we were to retreat to a siege mentality displayed through civil unrest to promote the agenda of a few.

We should take our anger out on those that have failed us and not on one another. The courts and the ballot box are the places to vent our anger not on our neighbours!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: October 1 2009

A Fairy Story.

Once upon a time the Government had a large warehouse full of scrap. They did not really know what to do with it so they paid vast sums of money to store the scrap in a warehouse belonging to a friend of the party.

A local TD issued a press release and said that as this was very valuable scrap he would make sure that it was safe. Just in the public interest you understand.

The TD hired very good consultancy firm to study the problem. He knew that it was a very good consultancy firm because the same firm had helped him get elected in spite of those nasty rumours about him that were doing the rounds at the time. The very good consultancy firm recommended that a committee be formed to establish a community employment scheme. The TD thought this was an excellent idea. He loved committees.

So a committee was formed with the TD as chairman and a community employment scheme was established.  The committee recommended that a night watchman be hired for the job, so they hired a night watchman. The TD knew he would make very good night watchman because he was his wife’s second cousin. The TD knew him well.

Suddenly they realised that the watchman may fall asleep without supervision so they hired a supervisor. The TD also knew him well. The supervisor then hired a foreman to oversee the watchman’s hut and also hired two more people, one to write the instructions for the night watchman and the other to write progress reports for the TD. The TD knew they were good people because they were on his election fundraising committee. He knew they would do a good job. They always did.

Then a Government agency enquired if the night watchman had been trained to their standards and if there was a safety statement in place. They organised a training programme to train the watchman to watch to best practice international watching standards. They then hired a quality control manager to maintain these standards.

Suddenly they wondered how are they were going to get paid? No one really knew so they hired a timekeeper and a payroll officer. The newly appointed timekeeper was a neighbour of the TD. He was delighted because he now had a well paying job in the public sector with some unbelievable perks including a wonderful pension. He decided to vote for the TD forever more and ensure his family voted likewise.

The TD then asked who would be accountable for all of these people? So they created an administrative office and hired three senior managers, all from the TD’s constituency. Soon they built a bigger building with a fountain out front and they hired a receptionist to sit in the lobby under all the artwork. The receptionist was essential because the TD knew that perception is everything in politics.

The night watchman continued to stay in the hut every night minding the scrap because that was the object of the exercise.

One summer they discovered that some of the scrap had wires. This was very exciting because rockets also have wires. Maybe the scrap was from a rocket!  This required some high level investigation.

So they organised a research trip for all of their people to go to NASA in Florida to look at rockets. The TD accompanied them because obviously, it was essential that someone of his standing be there too. Perception being everything to a politician he suggested they take the Government jet, use limousines, eat well and stay in best hotels to ensure that their importance was evident to everybody. Their partners came along for the ride. Perception being everything to a politician it was essential that they regularly get their hair done or rent a hat or two on expenses so they too could look suitably important.

Then the financial controller announced that they were way over budget. It was essential to cutback on any unnecessary expenditure if they were to get their annual bonus.

So they laid off the night watchman. Because he wasn’t really necessary!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: September 24 2009

August In Lisbon!

Michael O Leary said reading the Lisbon treaty was as interesting as reading Peig Sayers in school. Having spent much of August torturing myself by reading it, I agree. However now I feel that I can make an objective and informed opinion on the Yes-No debate.

So I will go on the record by stating that I will be voting YES in the upcoming election. I recommend you do likewise. I believe Ireland’s future should be as part of a stronger, more democratic and efficient Europe. Our reputation amongst member nations is crucial to our ability to create jobs, access finance and protect our interests. A yes vote can only strengthen our position and give us a stronger voice at the heart of the legislative process.

My top 10 reasons for advocating a YES vote are outlined below:

1) You can't run a Union of 27 countries with machinery designed for a Community of six, nor can you meet the challenges of the 21st century using methods designed for the 1950s.

2) The Treaty makes the EU more democratic. EU citizens will have right to petition the commission to launch new initiatives. Irish TD’s and Senators can challenge the Commission on any proposal they see fit.

3) The Treaty will extend the rights of EU citizens by making the EU a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, and by giving legal force to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. These include the right to life, to education, to freedom of thought, to equality before the law and to workers' rights such as the right of collective bargaining and collective action.

4) It will make it easier for the EU to make policy demanded by the public in areas such as climate change and energy security etc.  EU countries will be able act together in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

5) The treaty allows the EU to deliver results more effectively through majority voting. Unanimity will still be required in fields such as taxation – imperative to protect Irelands low corporation tax rate. In issues of national sovereignty the national veto will be remain.

6) Majority voting enables the EU to deal more efficiently with terrorism, cross-border crime, illegal immigration and human trafficking. EU action in these matters will be taken by the European Parliament, which will take the decisions jointly with the Council of Ministers.

7) The Treaty makes EU decision-making more transparent. The Council of Ministers will have to hold its meetings in public when enacting new EU policies or legislation. It is proposed that these meetings will be recorded and will possibly be televised. The President of the Council will be elected for up to five years providing stability and more visible leadership.

8) The passing of the Lisbon treaty will NOT in any way legitimise euthanasia or abortion in Ireland. This is a definite.

9) The treaty will NOT compromise Ireland's or any other country's neutrality.  Defence remains a matter of national sovereignty. This is a definite.

10) The treaty does NOT interfere with Irelands minimum wage rates in any shape or form. This is a definite.

Post Script:  Whatever way you decide to vote make sure your decision is based on fact and not emotive rhetoric. There is much negative information and dishonest spin in the public domain on this subject at present. It is important to make an informed decision. Irelands need informed decision now more than ever.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: September 17 2009

Gold In The Hills

We are running out of oil. As a fuel it leaves a lot to be desired in the modern world as its carbon emissions are causing increasing climatic change that threatens our very survival.

As a nation we import €30 billion of fossil fuels every year. That is €30 Billion we give to other countries this year and every year. If we could replace this expense we would solve all our economic and environmental problems. Energy and its provision is without doubt the key to our long-term prosperity as a nation.

One group of people have decided to tackle this issue and crucially provide a solution. They are a voluntary group of people working together for the common good that have come up with a solution to our energy needs in a sustainable and environmentally friendly fashion. ‘The Spirit Of Ireland’ group have an interesting proposal, one that is visionary, credible and workable. It deserves serious consideration.

Ireland is a wind swept country. The western seaboard is one of the windiest places on earth. Wind is a wonderful source of natural, emissions free energy especially for the production of electricity. However, electricity has one significant drawback in that it cannot really be stored.

Therefore wind as a power source is limited in its abilities to adequately meet our needs. It is difficult to predict, intermittent, variable in strength and often unavailable when required. It creates instabilities in the power network and is very difficult to dispatch. In short, wind is limited unless it can be stabilised, harnessed and rendered commercially usable. The Spirit of Ireland group have devised a solution to this limitation. If implemented it will have an immense financial impact on the Galway and Connemara region.

Their proposal will make wind usable through a cost-effective means of storing its energy by building large Hydro Storage Reservoirs. They propose putting a dam in selected coastal valleys with large underground pipes leading to the sea. The seawater would be pumped into the valley from power provided by wind when readily available. The water would then be released back to the sea generating constant electricity as it flows. Thus the reservoir in effect enables the electricity to be stored and used at will.

The environmental issues are minimal other than a valley would be turned into a seawater lake. It would be developed as a natural resource and would blend fully into the landscape. It could become a valuable social amenity. All of the negative consequences of burning fossil fuels are negated with the added benefits of:

Fifty years ago many of the Arab nations were economically disadvantaged relying primarily on subsistence agriculture for a living. Oil was discovered and almost overnight these countries became amongst the wealthiest nations on the planet. Along the western seaboard we have our own oil wells in the form of wind and wave power and if we put this plan in place to harness this power we too could be looking at untold riches. We can easily become a net exporter of energy with all the resulting benefits.

This is a route to economic success; all the more commendable because its not a political initiative. This proposal is the ultimate in smart economic thinking with the added benefit of being environmentally sound. The opportunity facing this country is enormous and should be availed of immediately. This opportunity favours Galway.

This is a win-win proposal. Sustainable high value employment providing community based cooperative style power with the resulting riches being channelled back into the local economy. A positive environmental impact resulting in a net gain for all concerned and economic security for our children. Isn’t it time we got proactively involved in initiatives such as this?

Post Script: This is one of the most farsighted and innovative proposal I have ever come across. As it is not a political initiative it has not become tainted by self-serving political demands, so it might actually work.

It is truly green and economically sound, in a real, practical and realisable sense. One that has a chance of working.

Check it out on their website www.spiritofireland.org.

16 September 2009

        Statement by Ceann Comhairle             

John O’Donoghue, TD

Two days ago Members of Dáil Éireann received a letter from me in relation to costs incurred by me as an office holder. As some Members have raised concerns about the matters addressed in that letter, I think it is appropriate that, today, I re-emphasise and clarify points intended to have been communicated by that letter. Before so doing, I want to make one observation.

In the debate about Ministerial costs, context is everything. Some Ministers will incur greater costs than others by virtue of the nature of their portfolio. That is an unavoidable fact of life. But such costs are not incurred without controls. There is a statutory framework within which costs are incurred, paid and audited. There are a number of fundamental propositions that need to be repeated. They are as follows:

(1) The provision of services, hotel accommodation, car hire and so forth were arranged, in accordance with standard procedures.

(2) The costs are paid by the relevant Departments, having been reviewed by officials in the Departments.

(3) The accounts of Departments (including expenditure such as these costs) are the subject of an annual audit.

(4) At no stage during my tenure of office as Minister were any of these costs challenged as being in any way improper.

(5) All of the costs so incurred and paid were in compliance with the Department of Finance guidelines.

(6) I made no financial profit from the incurring and defraying of these costs to third parties.

(7) The costs were legitimately incurred and paid to service providers.

When I expressed sincere regret in my letter of explanation to Members I meant it and I can assure Members that I have no difficulty in expressing my regret and saying I am sorry.

I was not aware of the cost of these arrangements and when I read the detail in the past weeks I was embarrassed that such costs were associated with some of the arrangements made on my behalf. I sincerely regret that,

although on official duty, such considerable costs were incurred. I apologise for this. I fully appreciate how the very considerable cost of executing the office of Minister for Arts, Sports and Tourism, and indeed any ministerial office, during those years now being commented on is very substantial against today's backdrop. This is so particularly when many more people are facing serious financial difficulties. Moreover, I can fully understand how many people were shocked to read some of the detail. I apologise to these people, in particular, for the disquiet this controversy has caused.

I sincerely regret that I did not pay more attention to the cost of the arrangements provided for me. I was fully focused on my duties as an office holder at the time and would not be concerned with this level of detail.

I am sorry that these costs occurred. As I indicated in my letter I fully intend with the cooperation of Members to further the case made to the Minister for Finance (who has responsibility in the area of Members expenses) with renewed vigour, to pursue reforms and efficiencies in this area.

To avoid any recurrence of the justified public disquiet, and to avoid controversy and embarrassment arising from excessive expenditure on costs, I have asked the relevant officials in the Oireachtas, as a matter of urgency, to review procedures in order to ensure that such expenditure is strictly controlled and that there is an appropriate emphasis on economy in relation to the Office of the Ceann Comhairle in the future.

Today I have instructed officials in the Ceann Comhairle?s office to place in the Dáil Library as soon as practicable the records of all travel, accommodation and related cost incurred and paid since I was elected Ceann Comhairle.

I hope that my statement today will enable Members of the Dáil to concentrate on more pressing issues facing the State.

Taken from www.ireland.com

Questions on the Ministers statement:

1) Why was his wife accompanying him to many of these events? She was not elected nor does she represent the Irish people. Why then do the Irish people have to pay for her to go on holiday?

2) Did the Minister never question even to himself how appropriate it was to live like a monarch or rock-star.

3) Why did he think that attendance at some of the events was essential?

4) Should we rename the portfolio as 'Minister of Fun?'

Words of Wisdom

"We’re in this mess, not because Fianna Fáil policies have failed, but because they have succeeded."  

                        - Enda Kenny

"I will remind the House, perhaps in 12 or 18 months, when prices have again increased by 25% or 30%, that they were told this by the Leader of the House"

                                         - Senator Donie Cassidy (10-4- 2008)

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: September 10 2009

Playing With Traffic

I wrote recently of the need to get the Galway City By-Pass back on track and how it should only be one facet of an integrated public transport programme. Developing such a programme is really the crux of the matter as a one-track approach will not provide a long-term solution.

Galway urgently needs a transport programme of vision focussed on the needs of the city going forward and not one that is retrospective in its vision. Such a programme should incorporate bus, road and rail transport in tandem with one another and not as competitors for funding, customers or routes. The focus should be on the overall result in transport efficiency terms.

Firstly let me acknowledge that bus transport is vastly underutilised. Perhaps because the service offered in Galway is not up to acceptable international standards. It has no workable timetables, inefficient routes and crucially few bus shelters. That is not a reflection on the people involved rather it is a reflection on an operational structure that has suffered from a lack of Government investment for many years. As a result it cannot be service driven.

A Galway Bus Company in the same vein as Dublin Bus should replace the current provider. Increased bus numbers are essential with more bus lanes providing a rapid bus service. Bus shelters must be provided at every bus stop employing GPS technology linked to 'Information Speakers' informing the public of when the next bus is due and where it is going. It should focus on operational as opposed to economic efficiency. In simple terms it should meet the needs of the public.

Regular, cost effective, peak-time suburban shuttle bus services to all major satellite towns should be put in place. These should visit all of the major industrial estates every 15 minutes. Year round Park & Rides should also be established at suitable strategic locations. This should be the first and quickest step in a workable transport solution for Galway. All this is a given throughout Europe so why do we accept anything less?

Like it or not roads are an essential component in any cohesive transport strategy. People like the independence their cars provide. The outer by-pass is without doubt an essential component of any effective strategy. It defies belief that this essential infrastructure is still tied up by a legal challenge posed by serial activists most of whom have no ties whatsoever with the locality.

The Bishop O' Donnell Road should also be improved and upgraded to a dual carriageway. This road as it is at present is not capable of dealing with the volumes of traffic that negotiate it every day especially during rush hour traffic. It is the only artery from the cities largest population centre to the cities largest industrial base. It needs an immediate upgrade and should be given a priority.

The development of the Gluas project needs serious consideration. Trams and trains are an excellent proposal but unfortunately Government baulk at the proposed cost. If the Greens have any moral integrity left they will fast track this plan through Leinster House. Is this not an eminently suitable project for a public private partnership agreement?

It could be incorporated into the docklands development proposals (which are also an essential component of Galway’s 21st century development). Perhaps we should investigate a sky train around the City Centre, Salthill, Corrib, and Docklands region. It negates the problem posed to rail transport of our narrow medieval streets, has much less disruption and it has the added benefit of a substantial tourism spin-off. The argument that Galway is too small for tram service is undermined when the model works cost effectively and successfully in other European cities. As a concept it is a little radical but not impossible. Ultimately it just involves putting rails on stilts.

There is no doubt that more motorists would certainly take public transport if it were efficient, cheap and readily available. Galway has a traffic problem that needs addressing but the addition of few more antiquated buses are not the answer. Proper planning, foresight and effective investment is.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: September 3 2009

A boy called NAMA

Johnny Cash sang about ‘A Boy Named Sue’. A boy given a girls name in order to toughen him up for the difficult life he was to lead in his father’s absence. It got me thinking about how best to empower my own son in the light of the NAMA legislation potentially leaving a dreadful economic legacy for generations to come.

Make no mistakes about it NAMA as proposed will fail primarily because we are asked to believe that a Government that couldn’t properly analyse the source of its tax revenues in the good times is competent enough to manage the largest privately held property portfolio in the world.

It is proposed that impaired or toxic assets will be purchased from the banks at a discounted price and sold on at a future date when market conditions favour profitable property transactions. This is a fallacy because NAMA cannot purchase these assets at a substantial enough discount. The only way it could work is if the impaired assets are purchased at or below current market prices estimated to be between 20-30% of the current loan book valuations. Such discounted prices would not be sufficient to recapitalise the banks and shore up its balance sheets. The banks will simply need more money from Government to survive. That is why it will fail.

The rational for valuing these impaired loans compromises the whole scheme. The reality is that NAMA intends to offer a price sufficient to recapitalise the banking sector. The projected price of up to 80% of the loan values will be much too high to offer any return to the state. That is why it will fail.

It is claimed that NAMA would vigorously pursue the developers for payment of the outstanding debts. How do they expect to get paid? You simply cannot take something off someone if they do not have it. The developers in question do not have the money and are highly unlikely to ever have it again. They are destitute in legal if not actual terms. That is why it will fail.

So NAMA is not a viable policy until they identify how much we will have to pay for these assets? This should have been decided by now. It is not acceptable that the Government postpone the single most major decision in the history of the state in order to facilitate their summer holiday. Such casual treatment of legislation of this importance defies belief.

This country faces ruin because the Government is taking a huge gamble in an attempt to regain its political initiative and influence public opinion. Good governance should not involve gambling and NAMA is certainly a gamble. Anyhow good gamblers only take calculated risks. They make informed decisions based on the information that is at their disposal. This is not the case with NAMA. All the indicators suggest that this is flawed legislation. It is a bad gamble of monumental proportions. Yet they persist with the lunacy.

 Given the flawed fundamentals underpinning the plan it may leave this country in hock for decades to come. We are being held to ransom by economic illiterates.

If NAMA is implemented in its proposed format my kids may face penury for many decades to come. They will need to be tough. That is why I am thinking of changing my sons name to NAMA because as the song goes:

"Son, this world is rough
And if a man's gonna make it, he's gotta be tough
And I knew I wouldn't be there to help ya along.
So I give ya that name and I said goodbye
I knew you'd have to get tough or die
And it's the name that helped to make you strong."

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: August 20 2009

Bartlie, The King and The Clowen

Father Ted was my favourite comedy. It featured three Irish priests made to live on a remote island because they had faults that needed to be hidden from the general population. One was a drunk with unhealthy interests in teenage girls, one had misappropriated funds for his own use and one was an absolute imbecile.

RTE were afraid to touch it fearing the backlash from Irish catholic viewers, so it was left to Channel 4 to take the gamble. It was a great success. The gamble paid off although there was considerable opposition to having the clergy being portrayed in such an undignified manner.

Yes Minister was another excellent comedy. It portrayed a minister who was basically an incompetent buffoon while a Machiavellian civil servant made all the decisions in the background.

Both comedies were controversial in their day. They upset a lot of people because they had more than a little ring of truth about them. This has become apparent with the passing of time. Now I hear of a new comedy that will put them both into the shade.

It is called Bartlie, The King and the Clowen.

It is apparently a fantasy comedy about an inept and corrupt Irish politician called Bartlie who lived in a terraced house full of money. He loved to sign blank checks for another inept corrupt politician called King Cathal. It was all a great laugh. Cathal considered himself to be a noble king and lived in an enormous castle. Bartlie pretended that he was a man of the people and continued to live in a terraced house belonging to someone else.

Eventually a drug crazed market trader told everybody of how he used to secretly give Cathal money to continue to pretend he was the king. The people of the kingdom were appalled. Cathal retired to drink port in his castle and didn’t care what anyone thought. After all kings are above such matters and did not need to answer to the serfs. They were but a minor inconvenience. The serfs called him to answer to a tribunal but he claimed he couldn’t remember anything. It was all a great laugh.

Bartlie was next to be called to the tribunal. He was asked about the source of all the money in the terraced house. He happily explained that he got it from friends. He claimed that these friends wanted nothing in return. They were so kind that they were even willing to serve on state boards he said. Just to give the kingdom a dig out you understand. They were very kind indeed.

He realised that the serfs did not like this story so he invented another one. He won all the money on a horse! The serfs did not like this story either. Fearing for his safety he departed to his terraced house to drink ale, watch the Dubs, listen to Westlife and dream of one day becoming president. 

Another inept politician called Clowen who lived in a pub then became chief. He loved nothing more than to drink pints, sing songs and deny that he was responsible for the hole in the roof. It was all a great laugh. But the hole in the roof kept getting bigger and everybody kept getting wetter. It was an absolute mess.

Clowen could not understand what all the fuss was about. He kept saying that the fundamentals of the building were fine; he knew best. He knew that there was no problem, just a little damp, so he continued to sing songs, drink pints and make merry.  His buddies especially his favourite girl could not see the hole in the roof either and couldn’t understand where all the water was coming from. They too made merry.

Soon they all drowned and nobody laughed anymore. Because it just wasn’t funny.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: August 13 2009

Farming The Four Green Fields

Our current economic problems are well documented. However to deal with them we must first address the more fundamental problem of our antiquated political system. Our political system is broken and it needs reform if we are to avoid stumbling from one crisis to another without ever developing a progressive and equitable society. One that we can all become proud of.

We have been treated to economic incompetence and mismanagement on a massive scale. The country appears to be managed by a collection of former schoolteachers and solicitors. Most of whom I would not permit to teach my children or represent me in any way. Many of them are not suited to the requirements of national parliament. In the main the quality of candidate elected to Dáil Eireann is not of a sufficient calibre to manage this country. That is our most fundamental problem today.

Most of our elected representatives have no real business qualifications or commercial experience, yet they are tasked with managing an economy. Indeed a substantial number of our elected TD’s have absolutely no work experience of any kind outside of their political experience, such that it is. Many have been elected on their parent’s reputation alone. Having such limited experience is not sufficient preparation to empower competent legislators. It is certainly not enough to save this country.

This is not the fault of any elected individual. They are a product of an electoral system that facilitates the election of local wide boys and stroke pullers rather than competent legislators with the requisite foresight and ability. To put it simply we elect ‘Pothole Fillers’ not statesmen. People whose primary ability is the efficient maximisation of votes in their local area. We have too many elected officers of mediocre ability. We have opted for quantity rather than quality.

Many ministers are often more notable for their profile and geographic location rather than their individual achievements or abilities. Their primary accomplishment has been to distribute public funds in a fashion that would maximise their vote in their local area. Protecting their vote at all costs. They are dedicated to protecting their position by buying the public’s vote with the publics own money. This has led to a situation whereby they place self-preservation above national interest.  This culture needs to change.

In quantitative terms have far too many elected representatives in local and national Government. Currently farming our four green fields we have;

166 TD’s including 15 Senior Ministers and 15 Junior Ministers.

60 Senators.

29 County Councils incorporating 1627 Councillors.

5 County Boroughs and 5 Separate Borough Corporations.

49 Urban District Councils.

26 Boards of Town Commissioners.

8 Regional Authorities.

Numerous Local Authorities: Dublin Alone Has Four.

Elected Mayor’s proposed for Dublin and Regional Cities.

Irelands bi-cameral parliament hosts 166 TD’s and 60 Senators (Total 226) representing 4,203,200 people. That equates to one representative for every 18,598 people.

Compare this to the EU Average of 1 representative for 69,063 people and we can see that we are absolutely out of kilter with other European countries. This ratio needs to be radically increased.

It is time that we called a halt to this ridiculous situation. Gombeenman politicians, pothole fillers and glorified phone-box fixers are the root cause of the problems we face today. We need fewer people with greater ability, vision, courage and foresight. We need statesmen and legislators. We need quality over quantity and we need it immediately.

Post Script: Our current STV voting system was adopted in 1919 by the British government in a bid to ensure that the then Sinn Fein did not win power. It too needs reform. A smaller parliament elected from a more transparent and representative system is necessary.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: August 6 2009

Lets Get The Lead Out...

Once again water in Galway is undrinkable. Residents of Old Mervue, Bohermore, Shantalla, and Claddagh areas cannot use their tap water at present. If they do they risk being poisoned.

The council says that the quality of water dispatched to the areas is of the highest quality and that the contamination emanates from the lead pipes within the domestic dwellings themselves. This appears to be true. Paradoxically it is the houses themselves that are poisoning the residents. Either way nothing is being done as we currently have a political stand-off with nobody willing to take responsibility for solving this mess.

It is said to be a matter of finance. As a result the health and welfare of the residents are being sacrificed in order to save money. It is estimated to cost an average of €600 - €800 per house to change the piping within these houses. Both Galway City Council and the Dept of the Environment say that it is not their responsibility and that they cannot do anything about it. Meanwhile the residents continue to be poisoned.

This situation exists because cowards with no political or moral integrity are once again passing the buck. It is a valid point that the maintenance and upkeep of a private house is the responsibility of its owner. It is equally valid for the residents that cannot afford to upgrade their pipes to ask for some help from Government. This is not a situation of their making. A suggestion that some subvention from the proposed second homes tax be used to solve this problem has been tabled and with luck this may happen. If not what happens then?

One solution would be to offer three-way support to affected householders. The Dept of Environment and Local Council pay two thirds and they pay one third themselves. Government can organise an interest-free loan for those who cannot afford to pay their share up front.

If managed properly the employment spin-offs and resulting tax take would render this initiative revenue neutral. If made open to public tender then estimated figures could be radically reduced for such a volume of work. Our council should insist upon this with the Government. If it is not agreed then ALL councillors without exception should immediately withdraw their support for Government.

The bottom line is that once again many residents of Galway cannot drink the water. Leaving out the actual annoyance of the situation, people who are currently severely financially challenged are now tasked with purchasing water. This is not an acceptable situation. It needs to be dealt with immediately.

Clean drinking water is a most basic right in a developed society. Given that we are surrounded by the stuff, for there to be a problem drinking is a scandal that is farcical in the extreme.

I cannot fathom how our elected representatives in Government are not held to task about something as serious and unfair as this. It is nobody’s fault that the situation has arisen but the failure to deal with this matter lies squarely at the door of Government, local and national. It is time to do your jobs, guys.

Postscript: In the greater scheme of things we are talking about a small amount of money. Minister Gormally and Co should be forced to get their act together and find a workable solution. This can be solved quite easily given the political will, however it should never have become a political football. Why it is being let drag on so long is beyond me. Perhaps the areas affected are not seen as being of strategic importance to those who can implement a solution. Remember that, people of the affected areas, when the Government asks for your vote next time.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: July 30 2009

Who pays the piper...

We live in a society that clearly tolerates wrongdoing. We do not hold people accountable for their actions. People are not charged, walk free or are let out on bail for serious crimes and hence treat our laws with disdain and contempt. Others have their crimes ignored altogether because of who they are. Meanwhile our society pays a terrible price.

What kind of a message are we giving to our children when we openly tolerate wrongdoing and do not impose penalties on the culprits?

For example we have recently been handed a report detailing a litany of systemic clerical abuse inflicted highly vulnerable children. How many people were charged with these atrocities? None. The culprits have not been charged because we tolerate wrongdoing.

If we as a society did not tolerate wrongdoing Gerald Barry would have been incarcerated for his litany of serious violent crimes and would have been unable to commit the dreadful murder of Manuela Riedo. He should have been locked up a long time ago, as with many others around the country. Instead he was out on bail walking the streets of Galway.

In 2008 28,300 people committed serious crimes in the Irish state while out on bail. Our benign legal system and generous bail laws are simply an invitation to recidivist criminals to re-offend. Meanwhile 54 people were incarcerated in Ireland in 2008 for not paying a TV licence and 276 people were imprisoned in relation to the non-payment of a civil debt. How crazy is that?  

Our banks were guilty of greed and corruption. The claim is that they did not break the law. This is untrue. At a minimum they are guilty of fraudulent accounting. No penalties have been imposed. A few retired with full honours and obscene financial entitlements. In this instance we actually reward wrongdoing.

Our current Government have had a major role to play in the current crises. Yet they continue to deny any responsibility whatsoever and still hold office. Corruption in politics is commonplace. There are well documented cases involving Galway county councilor Michael (The Stroke) Fahy, Bertie Ahern, Charles Haughey, Liam Lawlor, Michael Lowry, Ray Burke, Padraic Flynn, Sean Doherty, Brian Lenihan to name but a few. Not only did not impose any sanction on these individuals, we re-elected them!

This tolerance of wrongdoing established a culture of political inertia and absolute incompetence in Government. Political stroke-pullers were nominated and elected instead of honest competent legislators and now they cannot cope with the results of their actions. They are clearly inept. We accepted this situation and now we are paying a dreadful price.

Why do we not make people accountable for their actions? Why do not impose the penalties as laid down in statute? If the laws are not suitable for our present day needs they should be changed. We need to become more proactive in this regard.

Wrongdoers should be made face the full rigour of the law. The previous history of violent criminals should be made available to juries. Bail should never be allowed in cases of crimes involving violence. It must be made apparent to wrongdoers that there will be repercussions for their actions. It is they not us that should pay the price.

All persons in all walks of life should be made accountable for their actions. We should not tolerate anything less.

Post Script: In July 2007 An Taoiseach Bertie Ahern was questioned about the declining economy. He asked why people posing such questions did not go and commit suicide. As a statement it was crass, insensitive and absolutely egocentric.

As an opinion it proved that he was patently unfit for office. He was never held to account for this statement amongst other things. He most certainly should have been. Accountability should start at the top.

Words of Wisdom

Fianna Fáil is the party of Vision, Energy and Ideas not the passive inheritors of events, We are the history makers!

Bertie Ahern

Can you believe it? Is this not proof positive that the man is delusional? Power corrupts etc.

--------------------------

This budget is no less than a call to patriotic action.

Brian Lenihan: 14-10-08

Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Samuel Johnson: 7-4-1775

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: July 23 2009

The Galway Olympics

The Volvo Ocean Race has come and gone and left a wonderful legacy to the people of Galway. It demonstrated what can be done with a little vision, courage and teamwork. It has started the debate for the redevelopment of the dockland region and opened up the Galwegian mindset to hosting other major events. It contributed in a massive way to the local economy. It was an unqualified success and is a credit to all involved with its management and organisation.

It is one of the world’s biggest sporting events and it graced Galway with its exciting if too brief presence. Like all good things it came to an end.

But guess what? The Olympics are on their way in 2012. Granted they are on in London but there is no reason that we cannot enjoy a massive financial, structural and social windfall here in Galway. The teams will want to be away from the hustle and bustle of the Olympics themselves and especially the difficulties of pre-Olympic preparation in such a large city. Olympic teams require three things:

This is where Galway can come into its own. We can deliver on all three of the above. Galway, Knock and Shannon Airports can provide daily services if required to London and other sites. We have a similar climate and we can provide the facilities if we start planning now.

For Example: We can easily develop the facilities for centre's of excellence in areas such as Boxing, Rowing, Sailing, Soccer, Archery, Cycling, Fencing, Handball, Shooting, Weightlifting, Equestrian, Tennis, Volleyball, Taekwondo, Judo, Hockey and Wrestling to name but a few. This is before we even examine certain aspects of the track and field events.

This is not an off the wall proposal. There is no reason we cannot play host to a large number of Olympic contestants and their support crews for four weeks prior to the event. With organisation on the ground here to ensure the facilities are available, and that the transport links are seamlessly efficient we could ensure that we capitalise on a tourism bonanza of unprecedented proportions. Remember some of these teams are exceptionally well funded so the average spend could be very high.

One thing that athletes often complain about is the boredom and monotony in the weeks leading up to the games themselves. With proper planning we could organise a schedule of entertainment that would complement the city and be open to the public. It could easily become the venue of choice for the athletes and develop into another festival of choice for the nation and beyond. With proper organisation Galway could be the accommodation base for all athletes that are planning to use Ireland as a base.

The Volvo race contributed in a lasting way to Galway. It may come back again to our shores and I sincerely hope it does. Either way we should continue to look beyond our horizons and develop new initiatives on a large scale to support our economy. All it requires is vision, courage and teamwork. As I have already identified this is something we have displayed in abundance. 

Words of Wisdom

"The trade unions are well able to step up to the mark and deal with the issues that need to be dealt with in the public sector"

Patricia King Vice President ICTU 19 July 2009

We will wait and see how true those words are.

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: July 15 2009

Galway Alliance Against Democracy

Around this time we usually turn to the Salthill air show for entertainment. For a lot of people it provides essential business revenue in addition to entertainment. Sadly it no longer exists due to a lack of sponsorship. Sponsorship that was lost it would appear as a result of controversy generated by a small group of activists that oppose the show for various ideological reasons.

The chief protagonist seems to be the Galway Alliance Against War (GAAW), which opposes the air show because it involves the use of machines of war. The GAAW is a minority interest group that effectively utilises the media to ensure that the wishes of a minority are imposed on the majority.

All right thinking people are against war on every level. However no airplane ever started a war, nor did any piece of engineering ever take a human life of its own volition. It needed a human being to direct it just as man needs to wield a knife to order to harm another. In itself a knife poses no danger to another human being. It is just another feat of engineering.  So too with the military aircraft.

This week I watched the Secretary General of the UN inspect an Irish military guard of honour without any histrionics about the soldiers carrying implements of death etc. Do the GAAW seriously believe that their anti-war credentials are greater than those of Ban Ki Moon and the entire UN?

While we are at it what is their position on using the Internet, a passenger jet plane, availing of satellite technology, using a mobile phone, X rays, laser technology, pneumatic tyres, even the humble knife, the list is endless. Do they use smoke alarms at home? Would they suggest removing the javelin, the shot putt or the hammer from the Olympics? All of these commenced life and still remain operational military weapons.

Do the GAAW seriously propose that admiring aircraft that are at the cusp of mankind’s engineering abilities somehow promotes war? It should be recognised for what it is. An exciting celebration of mans engineering and his ability to conquer one of life’s great frontiers.

Lets get real here. The air show is a celebration of how far we have come as a civilisation, and that includes our ability to develop technologies that empower civilised societies to protect itself against aggressors. It is fitting and proper that it should be so.

Mankind has had armed conflict throughout its history and will sadly continue to do so. Ban Ki Moon and his UN colleagues recognise this. Are they somehow less enlightened than the GAAW, or is the reality that the GAAW are a misguided organisation with a selective agenda. Do they even believe in democracy?

The Salthill air show entertained 120,000 people every year and never, ever caused or inspired any conflict of any kind except that generated by that GAAW itself. Their selfish insistence on imposing their will on the majority of Galway’s citizens is redolent of the drivers of armed conflict around the world. It is dictatorial, undemocratic and self-serving.

The vast majority want to see the air show resumed. It is essential to the livelihoods of a large number of people. The minority want it stopped with little regard to people’s opinion or livelihoods.

Words of Wisdom

"The IRA Army Council have a history of telling the truth. If they say they didn't do it, then I believe them"

- Bertie Ahern after the murder of Det. Garda Jerry McCabe

Just goes to show how in touch with the people he was..

-------------------------------

Given that I have much more to be doing than reading The Irish Times, and for that matter from what I can see you spend 99.9% of your time on the internet, and on the computer. I haven’t time to be reading The Irish Times and what they have to say. All I can say is that I cannot and it is my responsibility not to, make any public pronouncement on the basis that we have to adjudicate within the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment.

An Táiniste: Mary Coughlan TD

This raises a number of questions. Not least about the mindset of the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and employment.

1) What exactly are you doing if you are too busy 24/7 to read newspapers or the internet. The nation would love to know what you are doing and if you could show us the results of your endeavors.

2) I can only assume she was watching her tormentor (Leo Varadkar) constantly to estimate that from what she sees 99% of their time is spent on the internet. Is this what has her so busy? Why is she watching him?? (Suggestions please)

3) Why can the Minister responsible not make any pronouncement regarding her brief which is, wait for it.....enterprise, trade and employment!

4) Does her reflection on the relative unimportance of the Media, IT and News sectors reflect current Government policy?

5) When will the penny finally drop with both Brian Cowen, Mary Coughlan and the entire Fianna Fáil party that she is not suited to the position she now holds.

Other beauties from our Táiniste:

"My personal view is that this country is not ready for that and may never, ever, ever be ready for it” (May 2004) - as Minister for Social and Family Affairs, on the subject of gay male couples obtaining legal status as parents in the Republic of Ireland.

"I'll be doing my best for the people of the north-west, particularly my own county" (May 2008) - a few days after her appointment as Tánaiste.

"I ask for the indulgence of the House, given that we need clarity on this issue. Of the savings of €100 million, €86 million is for GPs and €30 million is for pharmacists."

"I think it's important to say that when it comes to the appropriate timing, then that will happen but that's not to say that we don't have a hands-on approach in the interim."

"We would like to revert back to the international reputation we had and continue to have."

---------------------------------------------------

"We've closed your businesses and they wont re-open until we say so!"

TEEU General Secretary Designate Eamon Devoy

Its good to see that he understands the 'partnership' element of Social Partnership. Is this the mindset within the Social Partners that Brian Cowen believes will solve the problems of the economy?

---------------------------------------------------

"If I'm in government fluoridation will go in the first month in office. That's a guarantee."

John Gormley TD, Feb 2007

Proof if it ever were needed that the Greens will say or do anything to get into and remain in power.As they said about the Normans they eventually became more Irish than the Irish themselves. So it is with the Greens and Fianna Fáil!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: July 9 2009

The cotton field back home…

A Government department is in court at present fighting another Government department over the Galway City By-Pass. Good news for those in the legal profession. An absolute nonsense for rational adults.

Surely in this time of fiscal rectitude the Government should instruct its agencies to sit down around a table with a mediator and avoid such hideously expensive court proceedings. Rational adults should always be able to reach a compromise without recourse to the money pit that is the Irish judicial system. A win-win situation will never be achieved in court.

The bypass is held up at present by judicial challenges from amongst others a Dublin domiciled self-appointed activist Mr Peter Sweetman, the Cork based Friends of the Irish Environment and a local environmental group ‘Hands Across the Corrib’ who claim the project is in breach of the EU habitats directive and apparently have the protection of bog cotton at the top of their agenda.

Serial activists appear to object to many developments around the country. Their motives and objectives may be above reproach in this case but the question needs to be asked why our planning laws allow such objections from people not directly affected by such matters. 

Why are people that are not directly affected by or do not even live in Galway allowed to hold up a development that is welcomed by the majority of its residents?

Is it not completely ludicrous for example that I could object to a development on the other side of the country?  I could cause mayhem to essential development throughout the nation on a whim. I could for example unfairly interfere with my business competitors. Is this not an anti-competitive practice with legally approval? The system is open to abuse.  I believe our planning laws need immediate change.

The argument in favour of protecting the bog cotton is undermined when you look at the vast swathes of blanket bogs being decimated in the midlands for the purposes of sourcing an environmentally unfriendly fuel to power environmentally unfriendly peat burning electricity stations.  Not a murmur from the above groups about this I notice.

A duplicitous approach to protecting the natural habitat of the bog cotton to say the least.

While we are at it, if the future of this particular bog cotton is so precarious why was planning permission granted for extensive residential ribbon developments in the local area? Where were these objectors then?

Many believe the arguments against the bypass are spurious, emotive and fuelled by third party agendas inflaming the situation and using the bog cotton as an emotive cover.  Others oppose the bypass for solid environmental and community based reasons. Either way compromise is required. Compromise is integral to the democratic process.

The city is under siege and is becoming an undesirable place to do business. We must protect employment, and stimulate the local economy (or we may be reduced to harvesting the cotton). The argument for protecting the bog cotton is irrelevant to a parent worried about feeding their children. That’s the reality of the situation.

However the bypass alone will not solve the long-term needs of the community.

An integrated transport strategy that incorporates bus, road and rail transport is essential. The bypass would be a good place to start.

Post Script: Government supports this situation, yet the Greens object to this bypass. Its time the Green Party got its priorities and its act in order. You cannot sit on the fence. It makes your bum sore as they found during the recent local elections.

Words of Wisdom

You can't build a smart economy based on dumb decisions.

Richard Bruton Dec 18 2008

Thats true, but watch them try!

Taken from: The Voice of Reason column:

Galway Advertiser: July 2 2009

Are all pigs really equal?

The Government’s recent job protection programme involves a €200 a week subsidy towards employees' wages. At first glance this seems a solid measure to protect employment. However all is not as clear-cut as it seems.

It is more spin than substance. It applies to the manufacturing and internationally traded services sectors and excludes all other industries. It is limited to €250 million and has no timeframe. As a policy it is long on rhetoric and short on detail.

At its core it substitutes possible dole payments with employment subsidies. It is revenue neutral for Government as it helps avoid the payment of redundancy. A win-win situation you might think.

However under scrutiny it is exclusive and unfair. It discriminates against certain business sectors and its employees? The sad reality is that job losses in the retail, non-manufacturing and indigenous sectors are completely ignored.

In the light of the sad news of the closure of Tom Hogan Motors last week it is apparent that this policy is a smokescreen that ignores businesses such as this and does little to benefit overall employment levels. This is not an acceptable situation.

In the Tom Hogan Motors’ situation it is especially poignant as this was a business that exhibited best practice in all of its operations. It failed because of systemic neglect and a lack of Governmental support to the industry. Indeed Government policy destroyed motor sales volume in its ham-fisted implementation of an essential emissions based VRT system. They pandered to wealthy lobbyists at the expense of the industry.

The 190 employees of Tom Hogan Motors have every right to ask why are they excluded from this job protection programme, when the Government is hugely complicit in the closure of their business. Are their jobs viewed as being of a lesser importance than those of someone from an export oriented, manufacturing or knowledge based industry?

If so why? They have paid their taxes. Are they not now entitled to the full protection of the state?

Perhaps Tom Hogan Motors doors would still be open if an equitable and inclusive enterprise policy were in place. This policy is absolutely unfair and does nothing to curb unemployment. It excludes vast numbers of people whose jobs are at risk and places others at a higher priority. It exhibits a poor understanding of the complex issues at hand.

Our enterprise and employment policy emphasises the knowledge led, internationally traded, services sector. And it is correct that it should do so (to a certain extent), but not at the expense of other business sectors. The bottom line is that we need an inclusive policy on enterprise that supports all sectors of industry.

More than 75 per cent of Irish business is private or family owned and it accounts for only 11 per cent of exports. This ratio is skewed and indicates that indigenous and domestically oriented business needs to be nurtured not ignored. These are the businesses with a real commitment to this country.

Government favouritism for certain industries, for special favours, and for buddies should be a relic of the past. One form of worker should never be favoured over another. This is blatant discrimination. It does not reflect well on the philosophy or thought processes of the policy makers.

George Orwell’s Animal Farm where all pigs are equal, but some pigs are more equal than others springs to mind.

And we know what happened to them!

Postscript: Mary Coughlan was in Boston Scientific taking advantage of a convenient photo op and then her entourage drove right past the workers of Hogan’s just as they got their devastating news.

Way to go Mary – That’s real commitment to enterprise and employment!

Words of Wisdom

"I think it is fair to say that 2007 represents a turning point for the Irish economy"                                                                                         

Brian Cowen talking up the economy during Budget 2007 speaking as Minister for Finance.

Maybe he is a prophet after all!

June 21 2009

VOTE YES TO LISBON

Ireland needs a future at the heart of a stronger, more democratic and more efficient Europe. There has been much negative comment on the contents of the Lisbon treaty, a lot of this comment was a tissue of lies.

I believe a yes vote can only strengthen our position and give us a stronger voice at the heart of the legislative process. I will explain why in the column below.

My reasons for advocating a YES vote:

You can't run a Union of 27 with machinery designed for a Community of six. You can't meet the challenges of the 21st century using methods designed for the 1950s. It is designed to make the EU more efficient, more transparent, more united on the world stage, more secure and – above all – more democratic.

I believe the Lisbon Treaty will make the EU more democratic by giving more power to the people. By passing this treaty EU citizens will have the official right to petition the Commission to launch new initiatives. The Lisbon Treaty gives more power to TDs and Senators in Ireland. They can challenge any Commission proposal they see fit.

The Lisbon Treaty will extend the rights of EU citizens by making the EU a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, and by giving legal force to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. These include the right to life, to education, to freedom of thought, to equality before the law… and workers' rights such as the right of collective bargaining and collective action.

The Lisbon Treaty will make it easier for the EU to make policy in areas where the public wants us to intervene: e.g. in areas like climate change and energy security. For the first time, these will explicitly become matters of EU responsibility. EU countries will be able to get their collective act together in cutting greenhouse gas emissions – and in talking with one voice to Russia and our other suppliers of gas and oil.

With the Lisbon Treaty, the EU will be able to deliver results more effectively through majority voting because Union of 27 countries can literally be paralysed by the unanimity requirement. Unanimity will still be required in fields such as taxation– a very sensitive matter for Ireland and other countries. In important areas of national sovereignty, the national veto will be kept.

The extension of majority voting into new areas will make Europe more secure – by enabling the EU to deal more efficiently with terrorism, cross-border crime, illegal immigration and human trafficking.But EU action on these matters will be taken under the democratic control of the European Parliament, which will take the decisions jointly with the Council of Ministers.

The Lisbon Treaty will make EU decision-making more transparent. The Council of Ministers will have to hold its meetings in public when enacting new EU policies or legislation.

The President of the Council will be elected for up to five years.This will give the EU a more stable and visible system of leadership than presently.

Finally, the Lisbon Treaty ensures that defence remains a matter of national sovereignty, so that each Government is free to decide what forces, if any, it will commit to any particular operation. The Treaty will therefore not compromise Ireland's, Sweden's, Austria's or any other country's neutrality.  Ireland's Constitution states that it cannot join a common European defence arrangement unless it is approved by a separate referendum of the Irish people.

So a "militaristic EU" sweeping young Irish men and women off to war is a myth, another one of the sensationalist lies proferred by the no campaigners for Lisbon 1.

Whatever way you decide to vote make sure your decision is based on fact and not emotive rhetoric. Irelands need informed decision now more than ever.

And before you contact me to ask...

Yes I have read it!

Words of Wisdom

'To attempt to rerun a referendum as a means of reversing the democratic decision taken by the people would be rightly regarded as an affront'.

Dick Roche TD 21.12.01

Proof positive it ever were needed that this Government will say anything to try get out of a sticky situation. Can we ever believe a word from this Government again?

To be absolutely clear I am fully in favour of the Lisbon 2 referendum. I believe the first referendum was rife with misinformation, scaremongering and lies on both sides and that the vote was skewed because of this. I also believe many people voted no as a protest against the incompetence and ineptitude of this Fianna Fáil/Green Government.

However Dick Roche asserts his authority and integrity and not be party to the second referendum. He should stand by his word and be a man. He must realise that he is elected to represent the people not the Fianna Fáil machine.

As it is he has just exposed himself for the sham politician the people suspected he was. An integral component of the Fianna Fáil machine of vested interests!

Strategies for dealing with trading difficulties

Taken from Pearce Flannery's column - Autobiz magazine

In the current economic environment we are all faced with difficult choices and dilemmas. Not least of which is the need to face up to some difficult situations with those that have a legitimate claim on our businesses; suppliers, financial institutions, clients and other stakeholders being ones that readily spring to mind.

Given the well- documented problems in our economy nobody could underestimate the difficulties facing small business. But it is imperative that the business drivers face the current reality of their business as it stands today. Only by confronting the brutal facts can you overcome the current challenges facing your business because it is impossible to know precisely where you are going if you don’t know precisely where you are.

The first essential strategy when faced with a difficult trading environment is not to bury your head in the sand. Every business, every man, woman and child in this country is facing a more challenging time at present. That includes the third party that you would prefer to avoid. Remember they too have their problems, but either way they will not go away.

Clear and effective communication is essential to see out the current difficulties with people that have a claim on your business. If you have liabilities to third parties including the financial institutions the best method of meeting your obligations is to face facts, call a meeting and to try to negotiate a better position for yourself. Your problems will not go away on their own accord.

Negotiation is the process of bargaining that precedes an agreement. Successful negotiation generally results in a contract between the parties. Best type of negotiation is “win-win” which means both parties will be satisfied with the result.

“Win-Win” negotiation is not about conflict. Successful negotiation results in long lasting and fruitful professional relationships between parties, reduced tension and stress associated with aggressive bargaining methods and leads to more productive and creative businesses.

Your suppliers will need your business in the future, it is in their interest to reach an amicable settlement to the current crises. We all need to be in a position to do business in the future so successful negotiation is the key to overcoming current difficulties.

There are five steps to a more successful negotiation process:

1. Be Prepared.

Make sure you are absolutely clear on what outcome you want to achieve before entering a negotiation. Plan your questions, strategies, alternative offers and suggestions based on how the other party may react. Study and research other party’s long-term goals, their recent activities and businesses and their past negotiation history and techniques. Ensure you know what their requirements or offers are before starting.

2. Listen Effectively.

The main purpose of effective listening is to understand the other person. By listening and showing genuine interests in other party’s offers, suggestions or ideas, you can create a positive and productive environment for empathic communication, which is more likely to results in success. Remember the other party will have their own problems and they may indeed be greater than yours.

3. Never Personalise

Never personalise a problem. You may feel that a supplier may have let you down. A good example is the situation with the banks at present. The culture of the financial institutions failed us all but no one person on the front line should be blamed. It is counterproductive and will not be conducive to getting the desired result. Likewise a competent negotiator appreciates and praises people involved for their contribution even if they had came up with the original idea themselves.

4. Compromise.

Be prepared to be flexible and to change your position and requirements base on how negotiation is progressing. If you cannot meet your suppliers expectations remember that they will need to come out of the process with something. You should have alternative offers or requirements in order to be able to deal with any unexpected proposition or ideas from opposite party. Remember this is a “win-win” negotiation not “I-want-to-win-all” negotiation. The results should bring success for both parties.

5. Recapitulate the Results.

At the end of the session, list all the points covered in the meeting. Make sure everyone is aware of the final agreement and their obligations thereof. Finally if at all possible fulfil your new obligations, if experiencing difficulties communicate these difficulties to the interested parties as soon as possible. A failure to communicate effectively may prevent your success in the future.

Feel free to contact me if you require professional representation. 

The Voice Of Reason and other good stuff consists entirely of my personal views and are not in any way intended to be reflective of either the entrepreneurs profiled in the book or any other third party. My views are not written to cause offence to any individual.

However if the cap fits.... !

If you want to hear more or discuss our acclaimed Strategic Management or Marketing Programmes or any of our training and development programmes please click on the Pragmatica logo to your immediate left.